LEADER 01873nam 2200433 n 450 001 996394292903316 005 20200824132040.0 035 $a(CKB)3810000000007657 035 $a(EEBO)2240942342 035 $a(UnM)99872571e 035 $a(UnM)99872571 035 $a(EXLCZ)993810000000007657 100 $a19881108d1647 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 04$aThe case of the Armie truly stated$b[electronic resource] $etogether with the mischiefes and dangers that are imminent, and some sutable remedies, humbly proposed by the agents of five regiments of horse, to their respective regiments, and the whole Army. As it was presented by Mr. Edmond Bear, and Mr. William Russell, October 15. 1647. unto his Excellency, Sir Thomas Fairfax. Enclosed in a letter from the said agents : also his Excellencies honourable answer thereunto 210 $aLondon $c[s.n.]$dPrinted in the yeare, 1647 215 $a[2], 24 p 300 $aEdited by John Wildman. Cf. Wing; NUC pre-1956 imprints. 300 $aFairfax's reply (p. 24) dated: October 18. 1647. 300 $aReproduction of original in the Harvard University Library. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aeebo-0018 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yCivil War, 1642-1649 607 $aGreat Britain$xPolitics and government$y1642-1649 701 $aFairfax$b Thomas Fairfax$cBaron,$f1612-1671.$0804819 701 $aWildman$b John$cSir,$f1621?-1693.$01002085 701 $aEverard$b Robert$ffl. 1664.$01005301 701 $aTrevers$b Edward$01020807 712 02$aEngland and Wales.$bArmy. 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bUk-ES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996394292903316 996 $aThe case of the Armie truly stated$92416040 997 $aUNISA LEADER 06084nam 2200553 a 450 001 9910965730003321 005 20251117100100.0 010 $a1-299-18474-X 010 $a90-04-24421-2 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004244214 035 $a(CKB)2670000000333899 035 $a(EBL)1128371 035 $a(OCoLC)829461150 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000834049 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11966442 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000834049 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10936905 035 $a(PQKB)11710363 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1128371 035 $a(OCoLC)828627429 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004244214 035 $a(PPN)170737365 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000333899 100 $a20130115d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aRichard Simon critical history of the text of the New Testament $ewherein is established the truth of the acts on which the Christian religion is based /$ftranslated, introduced and annotated by Andrew Hunwick 210 $aBoston $cBrill$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (404 p.) 225 0$aNew Testament tools, studies and documents,$x0077-8842 ;$vv. 43 300 $aIncludes index. 311 08$a90-04-24420-4 327 $tFront Matter /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tDisproof of Early Heretics? Arguments against the Validity of the Books in the New Testament. Remarks on the Premise Applied by Church Fathers to Prove the Books? Genuineness /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tTitles Heading the Gospels and Other Books in the New Testament. Whether the Titles Are by the Authors of those Books or Whether they Were Added /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tBooks Published in the Name of Jesus Christ and the Apostles. Of Several Forgeries by Early Heretics. Remarks on this Whole Question /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe first Fathers did not produce the originals of the New Testament in their disputes with heretics. Discussion of evidence used to show that churches retained such originals /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe books of the New Testament starting with the Gospel of St Matthew. The original of this Gospel was written in the Hebrew spoken by the Jews in Jerusalem at that time. Rejoinder to reasons contrary to this view /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tIn the time of Jesus Christ and the apostles, Jews in the area of Jerusalem spoke Chaldaic or Syriac. Mr Voss?s arguments against this view. Clarification of problems pertaining to this question /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Nazarene sect and their Hebrew or Chaldaic version of the Gospel of St Matthew /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Ebionites. Their Version of the Gospel of St Matthew. Other early Heretics who Used this Gospel /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Greek text of St Matthew. Its status. Comparison with the Hebrew or Chaldaic text. Rejoinders to Heretics? objections to this gospel /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe dates and order of the Gospels. Greek manuscript copies of St Mark cited in this regard. His Gospel generally believed to be the second. His role as St Peter?s interpreter /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tIn which language did St Mark write his Gospel? The last twelve verses of his Gospel are lacking in several Greek Manuscripts /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Gospel of St Luke. What made him publish it, given the existence of two others published before his. Of Marcion and his text of the Gospel of St Luke. The Catholics also made some alterations to this Gospel /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Gospel of St John. Heretics by whom it was rejected. Their reasons. Response to those reasons. Discussion of the twelve verses from this Gospel which are absent from some early manuscripts. Several Greek manuscripts cited to overcome this difficulty. Critics who falsely believed that the final chapter of this Gospel is not by St John /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tActs of the Apostles as accepted within the Church. Acts ascribed to other apostles are of doubtful authenticity /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tSt Paul?s Epistles in General. Marcion and his text of those Epistles. Forged letters ascribed to St Paul /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Epistle to the Hebrews: is it by St Paul, and is it Canonical? Views of the early Eastern and Western Churches; views on this Epistle from more recent times /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tThe Catholic or Canonical Epistles in general and in detail: clarification of problems pertaining thereto /$rAndrew Hunwick -- $tExegetic discussion of 1John 5:7, not present in most Greek manuscripts or other Western texts, nor in the earliest Latin manuscripts. The preface to the canonical Epistles ascribed to St Jerome in certain Latin Bibles is not by him. The impossibility of proving that the text of St Cyprian contained the self-same passage from the first Epistle of St John /$rAndrew Hunwick. 330 $aIn Critical History of the Text of the New Testament , 17th century Oratorian Richard Simon (1638-1712), ?father? of modern biblical criticism, surveys the genuineness, accuracy, authority, and reliability of all then known sources of the New Testament. He makes rigorous, objective, and expert use of a staggering quantity of material relating to the text?Greek and Latin manuscripts, early versions, quotations from the Old Testament in the New, from the Church Fathers and other commentators of all periods. Though in his day Simon was contradicted, opposed, persecuted, and silenced, it is precisely because, three centuries ago, he dared to be different, and because of his knowledge and his scrupulously ?scientific? approach, that his work deserves to reach a wider audience. 410 0$aNew Testament Tools, Studies and Documents$v43. 517 3 $aCritical history of the text of the New Testament 676 $a225.4/86 700 $aSimon$b Richard$f1638-1712.$0465131 701 $aHunwick$b Andrew$01631420 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910965730003321 996 $aRichard Simon critical history of the text of the New Testament$94479519 997 $aUNINA