LEADER 03199nam  2200637 a 450 
001 9910965002303321
005 20240313223527.0
010   $a3-86838-097-3
010   $a3-11-032248-X
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110322484
035   $a(CKB)2550000001096918
035   $a(EBL)1195529
035   $a(OCoLC)851970842
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000801489
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11508637
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000801489
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10774491
035   $a(PQKB)11763160
035   $a(DE-B1597)210962
035   $a(OCoLC)1013957460
035   $a(OCoLC)853248961
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110322484
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1195529
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10728639
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL503452
035   $a(Perlego)652604
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1195529
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001096918
100   $a20130709d2010      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aOn determining what there is $ethe identity of ontological categories in Aquinas, Scotus and Lowe /$fPaul Symington
210   $aFrankfurt $cOntos Verlag$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (183 p.)
225 1 $aEIDE : foundations of ontology ;$vv. 2
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a3-11-032218-8 
311 08$a1-299-72201-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $t Frontmatter -- $tTABLE OF CONTENTS -- $tACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- $tINTRODUCTION -- $tCHAPTER ONE: AQUINAS ON ESTABLISHING THE IDENTITY OF ARISTOTLE'S CATEGORIES -- $tCHAPTER TWO: SCOTUS'S CRITICISM OF AQUINAS'S DERIVATION OF THE CATEGORIES -- $tCHAPTER THREE: A RECONSIDERATION AND DEFENSE OF AQUINAS'S POSITION -- $tCHAPTER FOUR: LOGICAL SYNTAX AND LOWE'S FOUR-CATEGORY ONTOLOGY -- $tCONCLUSION -- $tWORKS CITED -- $t Backmatter
330   $aGenerally, categories are understood to express the most general features of reality. Yet, since categories have this special status, obtaining a correct list of them is difficult. This question is addressed by examining how Thomas Aquinas establishes the list of categories through a technique of identifying diversity in how predicates are per se related to their subjects. A sophisticated critique by Duns Scotus of this position is also examined, a rejection which is fundamentally grounded in the idea that no real distinction can be made from a logical one. It is argued Aquinas's approach can be rehabilitated in that real distinctions are possible when specifically considering per se modes of predication. This discussion between Aquinas and Scotus bears fruit in a contemporary context insofar as it bears upon, strengthens, and seeks to correct E. J. Lowe's four-category ontology view regarding the identity and relation of the categories. 
410  0$aEide ;$vv. 2.
606   $aOntology
615  0$aOntology.
676   $a230.6
700   $aSymington$b Paul$01851803
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910965002303321
996   $aOn determining what there is$94446111
997   $aUNINA