LEADER 01681cam--2200421---450 001 990001894620203316 005 20180404101402.0 035 $a000189462 035 $aUSA01000189462 035 $a(ALEPH)000189462USA01 035 $a000189462 100 $a20040802d1975----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $afre 102 $aIT 105 $aaf||||||001yy 200 1 $a<> visites pastorales dans le diocèse de Chartres pendant la première moitie du XVIIe siècle$eessai de sociologie religieuse$fRobert Sauzet 210 $aRoma$cEdizioni di storia e letteratura$aVicenza$cIstituto per le ricerche di storia sociale e di storia religiosa$d1975 215 $a371 p., [4] carte di tav.$cill.$d25 cm 225 2 $aBiblioteca di storia sociale$v4 410 0$12001$aBiblioteca di storia sociale$v4 606 0 $aVisite pastorali$xDiocesi di Chartres$z1600-1650$2BNCF 676 $a282.445124 700 1$aSAUZET,$bRobert$0154441 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990001894620203316 951 $aX.2.B. 2472(III D Coll. 43/4)$b16630 L.M.$cX.2.$d389316 951 $aX.2.B. 2472a(III 4 118)$b1861 DSSS$cX.2.$d389324 951 $aX.2.B. 2472b(A 2 2 42)$b995 CSSM$cX.2.$d411040 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aSIAV8$b10$c20040802$lUSA01$h1409 979 $aCOPAT3$b90$c20050405$lUSA01$h1003 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20160511$lUSA01$h1340 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20160511$lUSA01$h1348 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20160511$lUSA01$h1348 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20160511$lUSA01$h1357 996 $aVisites pastorales dans le diocèse de Chartres pendant la première moitie du XVIIe siècle$91386798 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04570nam 2200685Ia 450 001 9910964441303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9780674041998 010 $a0674041992 024 7 $a10.4159/9780674041998 035 $a(CKB)1000000000786748 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH23050833 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000100943 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11111472 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000100943 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10037713 035 $a(PQKB)10639334 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3300473 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10318466 035 $a(OCoLC)923111888 035 $a(DE-B1597)571833 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674041998 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3300473 035 $a(Perlego)1148464 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000786748 100 $a19990414d1999 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe Alex studies $ecognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots /$fIrene Maxine Pepperberg 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aCambridge, MA $cHarvard University Press$d1999 215 $a1 online resource (448p. ) $cill 300 $aOriginally published: 2000. 311 08$a9780674000513 311 08$a067400051X 311 08$a9780674008069 311 08$a0674008065 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [347]-408) and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPREFACE -- $t1. Introduction: In Search of King Solomon?s Ring -- $t2. Can We Really Communicate with a Bird? -- $t3. Can a Parrot Learn Referential Use of English Speech? -- $t4. Does a Parrot Have Categorical Concepts? -- $t5. Can a Parrot Learn the Concept of Same/Different? -- $t6. Can a Parrot Respond to the Absence of Information? -- $t7. To What Extent Can a Parrot Understand and Use Numerical Concepts? -- $t8. How Can We Be Sure That Alex Understands the Labels in His Repertoire? -- $t9. Can a Parrot Understand Relative Concepts? -- $t10. What Is the Extent of a Parrot?s Concept of Object Permanence? -- $t11. Can Any Part of a Parrot?s Vocal Behavior Be Classified as ??Intentional??? -- $t12. Can a Parrot?s Sound Play Assist Its Learning? -- $t13. Can a Parrot?s Sound Play Be Transformed into Meaningful Vocalizations? -- $t14. What Input Is Needed to Teach a Parrot a Human-based Communication Code? -- $t15. How Similar to Human Speech Is That Produced by a Parrot? -- $t16. How Does a Grey Parrot Produce Human Speech Sounds? -- $t17. Conclusion: What Are the Implications of Alex?s Data? -- $tNOTES -- $tREFERENCES -- $tGLOSSARY -- $tCREDITS -- $tINDEX 330 $a20 years ago Pepperberg set out to discover whether results of pigeon studies necessarily meant that other birds were incapable of mastering cognitive concepts and the rudiments of referential speech. This is a synthesis of her studies. 330 $bCan a parrot understand complex concepts and mean what is says? Since the early s, most studies on animal-human communication have focused on great apes and a few cetacean species. Birds were rarely used in similar studies on the grounds that they were merely talented mimics -that they were, after all, "birdbrains". Experiments performed primarily on pigeons in Skinner boxes demonstrated capacities inferior to those of mammals; these results were thought to reflect the capacities of all birds, despite evidence suggesting that species such a s jays, crows, and parrots might be capable of more impressive cognitive feats.;Twenty years ago Irene Pepperberg set out to discover whether the results of the pigeon studies necessarily meant that other birds -particularly the large-brained, highly social parrots - were incapable of mastering complex cognitive concepts and the rudiments of referential speech. her investigation and the bird at its centre - a male Grey parrot named Alex - have since become almost as well known as their primate equivalents and no less a subject of fierce debate in the field of animal cognition. 606 $aAfrican gray parrot$xBehavior 606 $aCognition in animals 606 $aAnimal communication 615 0$aAfrican gray parrot$xBehavior. 615 0$aCognition in animals. 615 0$aAnimal communication. 676 $a598.71 686 $aWT 2030$2rvk 700 $aPepperberg$b Irene M$g(Irene Maxine)$01810928 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910964441303321 996 $aThe Alex studies$94362487 997 $aUNINA