LEADER 03169nam  2200613 a 450 
001 9910963585503321
005 20240514050957.0
010   $a1-283-31260-3
010   $a9786613312600
010   $a90-272-7628-5
035   $a(CKB)2550000000064041
035   $a(EBL)794773
035   $a(OCoLC)759101567
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000991282
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11958459
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000991282
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10995932
035   $a(PQKB)11233845
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC794773
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL794773
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10509501
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL331260
035   $a(DE-B1597)720070
035   $a(DE-B1597)9789027276285
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000064041
100   $a19960104d1996      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aCase suspension and binary complement structure in French /$fJulia Herschensohn
205   $a1st ed.
210  1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJ. Benjamins,$d1996.
215   $a1 online resource (212 pages) $cillustrations
225 1 $aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory,$x0304-0763 ;$vv. 132
311 0 $a90-272-3636-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $aCASE SUSPENSION AND BINARY COMPLEMENT STRUCTURE IN FRENCH; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; PREFACE; Table of contents; CHAPTER 1. MINIMALIST SYNTACTIC REPRESENTATION; CHAPTER 2. CASE AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE; CHAPTER 3. UNACCUSATIVE VERBS AND AFFECTED DATIVES; CHAPTER 4. CASE DEFECTIVE PSYCH VERBS; CHAPTER 5. CASE SUSPENDING PRONOMINALS; CHAPTER 6. INALIENABLE UNDATIVES; CHAPTER 7. CASE SUSPENSION AND COMPLEMENT STRUCTURE; APPENDIX. GRAMMATICALITY SURVEY; REFERENCES; INDEXOF AUTHORS; INDEXOF SUBJECTS
330   $aAdopting the theoretical framework of the minimalist program, this study of syntactic limitations on complement configuration investigates the link between thematic external arguments and case. Using evidence from pronominal, psychological experiencer, and inalienable constructions, it argues that both accusative and dative are structural cases in French and that this duality is reflected in a parallel limit on argument projection. Larson's single complement hypothesis, which allows a maximum of two internal arguments, provides the theoretical justification for this proposal. The testing groun
410  0$aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science.$nSeries IV,$pCurrent issues in linguistic theory ;$v132.
606   $aFrench language$xCase
606   $aFrench language$xComplement
615  0$aFrench language$xCase.
615  0$aFrench language$xComplement.
676   $a445
700   $aHerschensohn$b Julia Rogers$f1945-$0164721
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910963585503321
996   $aCase suspension and binary complement structure in French$9484458
997   $aUNINA