LEADER 03360nam  2200637Ia 450 
001 9910963061703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-87609-510-4
035   $a(CKB)2670000000185598
035   $a(EBL)3137472
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000942164
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11543940
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000942164
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10971519
035   $a(PQKB)11475153
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3137472
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3137472
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10554817
035   $a(OCoLC)922997883
035   $a(BIP)36226863
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000185598
100   $a20120511d2011      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aManaging instability on China's preiphery /$fPaul B. Stares, ... [et al.]
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aNew York $cCouncil on Foreign Relations, Center for Preventive Action$dc2011
215   $a1 online resource (88 p.)
300   $a"September 2011".
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a""Paul B. Stares, Scott A. Snyder, Joshua Kurlantzick, Daniel Markey, and Evan A. Feigenbaum""; ""Contents""; ""Foreword""; ""Overview""; ""Instability in North Korea and Its Impact on U. S.- China Relations""; ""Myanmar: Sources of Instability and Potential for U. S.- China Cooperation""; ""Pakistan Contingencies""; ""Central Asia Contingencies""; ""Endnotes""; ""About the Authors""
330   $aIn comparison to the more familiar sources of friction in U.S.-China relations-notably Taiwan and Tibet-surprisingly little attention has been given to how developments along China's unstable periphery could strain and even potentially cause a serious rupture in bilateral relations. Certainly, there has been no systematic effort to examine and compare the most likely cases or to consider how the latent risks can be lessened. As a general observation, scholars and analysts in both countries tend to focus on specific subregions rather than engage in crossregional comparative assessments. With the goal of encouraging a broader assessment of potential sources of friction in U.S-China relations and how they might be mitigated, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) embarked on this study, "Managing Instability on China's Periphery." Each paper considers current sources of instability, potential crisis triggers, U.S. and Chinese interests-where they converge and diverge-and policy options for preventing a major crisis and mitigating the consequences.
606   $aNational security$zAsia
606   $aGeopolitics$zAsia
606   $aInternational relations
607   $aUnited States$xForeign relations$zChina
607   $aChina$xForeign relations$zUnited States
607   $aUnited States$xForeign relations$zAsia
607   $aChina$xForeign relations$zAsia
615  0$aNational security
615  0$aGeopolitics
615  0$aInternational relations.
676   $a327.73051
700   $aStares$b Paul B$0675783
712 02$aCouncil on Foreign Relations.
712 02$aCenter for Preventive Action.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910963061703321
996   $aManaging instability on China's preiphery$94476550
997   $aUNINA