LEADER 04716nam 22007331c 450 001 9910961450403321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a9786613609182 010 $a9780567660732 010 $a0567660737 010 $a9781280579417 010 $a1280579412 010 $a9780567484970 010 $a0567484971 024 7 $a10.5040/9780567660732 035 $a(CKB)2670000000178652 035 $a(EBL)894535 035 $a(OCoLC)787843483 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000661928 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11404250 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000661928 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10712480 035 $a(PQKB)10251781 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC894535 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL894535 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10554651 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL360918 035 $a(OCoLC)1057402194 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09258284 035 $a(UtOrBLW)BP9780567660732BC 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000178652 100 $a20150227d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDoctrine, dynamic and difference $fPieter de Witte 210 1$aLondon $aNew York $cT&T Clark $d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (273 pages) 225 1 $aEcclesiological investigations $vv. 15 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780567316820 311 08$a0567316823 311 08$a9780567236654 311 08$a056723665X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 241-250) and index 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Joint Declaration on Justification: Basis Issues -- 3. Reception of Theological Advances -- 4. The Reception of Previous Dialogue Results -- 5. The Joint Declaration: A Textual Analysis -- 6. Conclusion 330 $a"One of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference."--Bloomsbury Publishing 330 8 $aOne of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference 410 0$aEcclesiological investigations ;$vv. 15. 517 1 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference : to the heart of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic differentiated consensus on justification 606 $aJustification (Christian theology) 606 $2Christian Churches & denominations 615 0$aJustification (Christian theology) 676 $a234.7 700 $aWitte$b Pieter de$01798628 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961450403321 996 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference$94341499 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04260oam 2200697 a 450 001 9910962131703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9798400683121 010 $a9780313001567 010 $a0313001561 024 7 $a10.5040/9798400683121 035 $a(CKB)111056485489506 035 $a(OCoLC)609318020 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10018057 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000198276 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11182932 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000198276 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10169500 035 $a(PQKB)11269847 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3000685 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10018057 035 $a(OCoLC)50321707 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3000685 035 $a(OCoLC)1435635110 035 $a(DLC)BP9798400683121BC 035 $a(Perlego)4202207 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056485489506 100 $a19991201e20002024 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe marriage of heaven and earth $ealchemical regeneration in the works of Taylor, Poe, Hawthorne, and Fuller /$fRandall A. Clack 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aWestport, Conn. :$cPraeger,$d2000. 210 2$aLondon :$cBloomsbury Publishing,$d2024 215 $a1 online resource (167 p.) 225 1 $aContributions to the study of American literature,$x1092-6356 ;$vno. 6 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9780313312694 311 08$a0313312699 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [137]-147) and index. 327 $aCover -- The Marriage of Heaven and Earth -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1 Alchemy in Early America -- NOTES -- Chapter 2 Edward Taylor and the Transmutation of Soul -- TAYLOR'S ALCHEMICAL PARADIGM -- NOTES -- Chapter 3 Alchemical Spirits in Eighteenth-Century America -- NOTES -- Chapter 4 Poe's Alchemy and the Regeneration of Imagination -- THE VAS HERMETICUM -- THE CONJUNCTION IN THE GRAVE -- POE'S HERMETIC GARDEN AND THE MARRIAGE OF HEAVEN AND EARTH -- NOTES -- Chapter 5 Hawthorne's Alchemy of Love -- HAWTHORNE'S HERMETIC MYTHOLOGY -- THE HEART OF THE STONE -- NOTES -- Chapter 6 Fuller and the Golden Seed -- NOTES -- Epilogue -- NOTES -- Works Cited -- Index -- About the Author. 330 8 $aFrom the Middle Ages to the close of the 17th century, alchemy was fundamental to Western culture, as scores of experimenters sought to change lead into gold. Though its significance declined with the rise of chemistry, alchemy continued to captivate the imagination of writers and its images still appear in modern creative works. This book examines the literary representation of alchemical theory and the metaphor of alchemical regeneration in the works of Edward Taylor, Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Margaret Fuller. While Taylor used alchemical metaphors to illustrate the redeeming grace of God upon the soul, these same metaphors were used by Poe, Hawthorne, and Fuller to depict a broader concept of redemption. These later writers used alchemical imagery to describe both the regeneration of the individual and the possible transformation of society. For Poe, alchemy became a metaphor for the transforming power of imagination; for Hawthorne, it became a means of representing the redeeming power of love; for Fuller, it figured the reconciliation of gender opposites. Thus these four American writers incorporated the idea of regeneration in their works, and the tropes and metaphors of the medieval alchemists provided a fascinating way of imagining the transformative process. 410 0$aContributions to the study of American literature ;$vno. 6. 606 $aAmerican literature$y19th century$xHistory and criticism 606 $aAlchemy in literature 606 $aRegeneration in literature 615 0$aAmerican literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aAlchemy in literature. 615 0$aRegeneration in literature. 676 $a810.9/37 700 $aClack$b Randall A.$f1958-$01799090 801 0$bDLC 801 1$bDLC 801 2$bDLC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910962131703321 996 $aThe marriage of heaven and earth$94342240 997 $aUNINA