LEADER 04262nam 2200745Ia 450 001 9910961679703321 005 20251017110055.0 010 $a9786610185627 010 $a9780309184571 010 $a0309184576 010 $a9781280185625 010 $a1280185627 010 $a9780309593915 010 $a0309593913 010 $a9780585213521 010 $a0585213526 035 $a(CKB)110986584752912 035 $a(OCoLC)44958964 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10055553 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000237504 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11173665 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000237504 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10191531 035 $a(PQKB)10310607 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3376375 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3376375 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10055553 035 $a(OCoLC)923263302 035 $a(Perlego)4737769 035 $a(DNLM)1645779 035 $a(BIP)7351143 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584752912 100 $a20000323d1999 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aReview of disability evaluation study design $ethird interim report /$fGooloo S. Wunderlich and William D. Kalsbeek, editors 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$d1999 215 $a1 online resource (38 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9780309068307 311 08$a0309068304 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 23-24). 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members. 330 $aThe Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey. 517 1 $aReview of the disability evaluation study design 606 $aDisability evaluation$xResearch$zUnited States 606 $aDisability insurance$zUnited States 606 $aSupplemental security income program$zUnited States 615 0$aDisability evaluation$xResearch 615 0$aDisability insurance 615 0$aSupplemental security income program 676 $a616.07/5/072073 701 $aWunderlich$b Gooloo S$01088603 701 $aKalsbeek$b William D.$f1946-$0102822 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961679703321 996 $aReview of disability evaluation study design$94365594 997 $aUNINA