LEADER 03790nam  22006254a 450 
001 9910961675103321
005 20251116141118.0
010   $a0-309-18387-1
010   $a0-309-51512-2
035   $a(CKB)110986584752968
035   $a(EBL)3375403
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000236111
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11176304
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000236111
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10173133
035   $a(PQKB)10347335
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375403
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10038676
035   $a(OCoLC)923256192
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375403
035   $a(BIP)53854987
035   $a(BIP)6397739
035   $a(EXLCZ)99110986584752968
100   $a20000810d2000      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aReporting district-level NAEP data $esummary of a workshop /$fCommittee on NAEP Reporting Practices, Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting ; Pasquale J. DeVito and Judith A. Koenig, editors
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2000
215   $a1 online resource (65 p.)
300   $a"Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council."
311 08$a0-309-06893-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a""Front Matter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Background""; ""3 NAEPa???s Influence on State Instructional and Assessment Programs""; ""4 Comparisons with National Benchmarks: Pros and Cons""; ""5 Factors That Influence Interest In District-Level NAEP""; ""6 Summing Up: Issues to Consider and Resolve""; ""References""; ""APPENDIX A Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants""; ""APPENDIX B Background Information on NAEP""
330   $aThe National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) has earned a reputation as one of the nation's best measures of student achievement in key subject areas. Since its inception in 1969, NAEP has summarized academic performance for the nation as a whole and, beginning in 1990, for the individual states. Increasingly, NAEP results get the attention of the press, the public, and policy makers. With this increasing prominence have come calls for reporting NAEP results below the national and state levels. Some education leaders argue that NAEP can provide important and useful information to local educators and policy makers. They want NAEP to serve as a district-level indicator of educational progress and call for NAEP results to be summarized at the school district level. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data explores with various stakeholders their interest in and perceptions regarding the likely impacts of district level reporting.
606   $aEducational tests and measurements$zUnited States$vCongresses
606   $aSchool districts$zUnited States$xEvaluation$vCongresses
615  0$aEducational tests and measurements
615  0$aSchool districts$xEvaluation
676   $a371.26/0973
701   $aDeVito$b Pasquale J$01810760
701   $aKoenig$b Judith A$01495660
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on NAEP Reporting Practices: Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting.
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.$bBoard on Testing and Assessment.
712 12$aWorkshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP$f(1999 :$eWashington, D.C.)
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910961675103321
996   $aReporting district-level NAEP data$94468264
997   $aUNINA