LEADER 04716nam 22007331c 450 001 9910961450403321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a9786613609182 010 $a9780567660732 010 $a0567660737 010 $a9781280579417 010 $a1280579412 010 $a9780567484970 010 $a0567484971 024 7 $a10.5040/9780567660732 035 $a(CKB)2670000000178652 035 $a(EBL)894535 035 $a(OCoLC)787843483 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000661928 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11404250 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000661928 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10712480 035 $a(PQKB)10251781 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC894535 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL894535 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10554651 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL360918 035 $a(OCoLC)1057402194 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09258284 035 $a(UtOrBLW)BP9780567660732BC 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000178652 100 $a20150227d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDoctrine, dynamic and difference $fPieter de Witte 210 1$aLondon $aNew York $cT&T Clark $d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (273 pages) 225 1 $aEcclesiological investigations $vv. 15 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780567316820 311 08$a0567316823 311 08$a9780567236654 311 08$a056723665X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 241-250) and index 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Joint Declaration on Justification: Basis Issues -- 3. Reception of Theological Advances -- 4. The Reception of Previous Dialogue Results -- 5. The Joint Declaration: A Textual Analysis -- 6. Conclusion 330 $a"One of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference."--Bloomsbury Publishing 330 8 $aOne of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference 410 0$aEcclesiological investigations ;$vv. 15. 517 1 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference : to the heart of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic differentiated consensus on justification 606 $aJustification (Christian theology) 606 $2Christian Churches & denominations 615 0$aJustification (Christian theology) 676 $a234.7 700 $aWitte$b Pieter de$01798628 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961450403321 996 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference$94341499 997 $aUNINA