LEADER 03558nam  2200721 a 450 
001 9910961357803321
005 20251117115809.0
010   $a1-134-86019-6
010   $a1-280-14394-0
010   $a1-134-86020-X
010   $a0-203-98106-5
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203981061 
035   $a(CKB)1000000000001009
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000113498
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11141572
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000113498
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10100159
035   $a(PQKB)11602592
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC242132
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL242132
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10017052
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL14394
035   $a(OCoLC)475959982
035   $a(OCoLC)61243763
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000001009
100   $a19930923d1994      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe bodies of women $eethics, embodiment, and sexual difference /$fRosalyn Diprose
210   $aLondon ;$aNew York $cRoutledge$d1994
215   $axi, 148 p
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 08$a0-415-09782-7 
311 08$a0-415-09783-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [139]-145) and index.
327   $achapter 1 Feminism and the ethics of reproduction -- chapter 2 Ethics, embodiment and sexual difference -- chapter 3 Hegel?s restricted economy of difference -- chapter 4 Sexual difference beyond duality -- chapter 5 Nietzsche on sexed embodiment -- chapter 6 Biomedical ethics and lived, sexed bodies -- chapter 7 Conclusions.
330   $aWhat sort of ethics do we need? Rosalyn Diprose argues that the usual approaches to ethics both perpetuate and remain blind to the mechanisms of the subordination of women. In Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Differences, she claims that injustice against women is found in the social discourses and practices which both evaluate and constitute their modes of embodiment as improper in relation to men. Diprose critically analyses the attempts in both feminist and non-feminist ethics to recognise the role of sexual difference and the biomedical discourses whose descriptions mask a constitution and regulation of the 'body'. Her critiques draw on insights from Anglophone feminist theory and continental philosophy, and are supported by critical readings of Irigaray, Cornell and Fraser, Hegel, Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, Derrida and Foucault. What emerges is a new ethics of sexual difference which not only better locates the mechanisms of discrimination but also provides the means to subvert them.
606   $aFeminist ethics
606   $aWoman (Philosophy)$xMoral and ethical aspects
606   $aHuman reproduction$xMoral and ethical aspects
606   $aSex differences$xMoral and ethical aspects
606   $aBody image
606   $aHuman body$xMoral and ethical aspects
606   $aFeminist theory
615  0$aFeminist ethics.
615  0$aWoman (Philosophy)$xMoral and ethical aspects.
615  0$aHuman reproduction$xMoral and ethical aspects.
615  0$aSex differences$xMoral and ethical aspects.
615  0$aBody image.
615  0$aHuman body$xMoral and ethical aspects.
615  0$aFeminist theory.
676   $a176/.082
700   $aDiprose$b Rosalyn$0859662
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910961357803321
996   $aThe bodies of women$94484417
997   $aUNINA