LEADER 08488nam 2200697Ia 450 001 9910961262003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786612154683 010 $a9781282154681 010 $a1282154680 010 $a9789027292568 010 $a9027292566 024 7 $a10.1075/tsl.69 035 $a(CKB)1000000000535100 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000249967 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11209149 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000249967 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10228965 035 $a(PQKB)11783773 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC623140 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL623140 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10172330 035 $a(OCoLC)237770687 035 $a(DE-B1597)720914 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789027292568 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000535100 100 $a20060922d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aSplit auxiliary systems $ea cross-linguistic perspective /$fedited by Raul Aranovich 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins Pub.$dc2006 215 $avii, 277 p 225 1 $aTypological studies in language,$x0167-7373 ;$vv. 69 300 $aIncludes selected papers from a workshop on Cross-linguistic variation in auxiliary selection, held at the University of California, Davis, May 31-June 1, 2002. 311 08$a9789027229816 311 08$a9027229813 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aSplit Auxiliary Systems -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Foreword -- Split auxiliary selection from a cross-linguistic perspective -- 1. Auxiliary selection and split intransitivity -- 2. The Unaccusative Hypothesis and split auxiliary selection -- 3. Semantics of auxiliary selection -- 4. Other unaccusative tests -- 5. Mismatches among tests -- 6. Verbs of variable behavior -- 7. Mismatches across languages or dialects -- 8. Diachronic and sociolinguistic factors in auxiliary selection -- 9. Conclusions and contents of the volume -- References -- Transitivity parameters and auxiliary selection by L2 students of German -- 1. Literature review -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Accuracy of production -- 4. Influence of parameters -- 4.1. Number of participants -- 4.2. Telicity -- 4.3. Punctuality -- 5. Decision making -- Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- Appendix A. Questionnaire -- Part A -- Student Questionnaire -- Part B -- References -- An irrealis BE auxiliary in Romanian* -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Fi and unaccusatives -- 2.1. Morphologic status -- 2.2. Tense morphology -- 2.3. Past participle agreement -- 2.4. Past participle and adjective coordination -- 3. The auxiliary fi -- 3.1. The auxiliary status -- 3.2. The distribution of the auxiliary fi -- 3.3. The inflection of the auxiliary fi -- 3.4. A syntactic structure for the auxiliary fi -- 3.5. Fi in other checking 9configurations3 -- 4. Conclusions -- References -- Auxiliary selection and split intransitivity in Paduan -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Split intransitivity: A multidimensional, gradient view -- 3. Split intransitivity in Paduan -- 3.1. Loci of invariance and variation -- 4. Variation in the encoding of split intransitivity in Paduan and the auxiliary selection hierarchy -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- The development of the HAVE perfect. 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Evidence from Classical Greek -- 4. The Influence of Greek on Classical Latin -- 5. Later developments in Greek: Christianity and Anti-Sophism in the Koiné -- 6. The role of Latin influence on Greek -- 7. The role of Christianity in Latin -- 8. Conclusion -- Primary sources -- References -- Agentivity versus auxiliary choice -- 1. Introduction -- 2. German auxiliary selection and unaccusativity -- 3. Pronominal binding in AcIs -- 3.1. Accusativus cum Infintivo (AcI) -- 3.2. Previous accounts of AcI-embedded pronominals -- 4. Pronominal binding and agentivity -- 4.1. Reconsidering the facts -- 4.2. A structural analysis -- 5. Agentivity versus auxiliary choice -- 6. Conclusion -- Appendix -- References -- Optimizing auxiliary selection in Romance* -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Auxiliary Selection Hierarchy -- 3. Optimizing auxiliary selection -- 3.1. Event features -- 3.2. Harmonic alignment -- 3.3. Formulating a *A Power Hierarchy -- 3.4. Establishing the language-particular ranking of *E -- 3.5. Verifying predictions in French and Italian -- 4. General predictions of the OT analysis -- 5. Diachronic predictions -- 6. Indeterminacy in auxiliary selection -- 7. The larger debate: Unaccusativity -- References -- Auxiliary selection in Chinese* -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Locative inversion -- 2.1. Intransitive verbs -- 2.2. Transitive verbs -- 3. Auxiliary selection -- 3.1. Verbs of change -- 3.2. States -- 3.3. Processes -- 4. Semantic determinants -- 4.1. Hu (1995) and Yang and Pan (2001) -- 4.2. Three factors -- 5. Syntactic approaches -- 5.1. Huang (1990) -- 5.2. Yu (1995) -- 5.3. Pan (1996) -- 5.4. Summary -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- Parameterized auxiliary selection -- 0. Introduction -- 1. A brief review: Is auxiliary verb selection a reliable verb class diagnostic?. 327 $a2. The Auxiliary Selection Hierarchy: An approach to unaccusative mismatches -- 2.1. The theory: Two semantic dimensions in a hierarchy of verb types -- 2.2. Experimental evidence: Keller & -- Sorace (2003) -- 2.3. Questions and issues -- 3. Parameterized Linking: An alternative account -- 3.1. Linking rules, compositional linking, and language-internal variation -- 3.2. Cross-linguistic variation: Parameterized linking rule systems -- 3.3. Where linking rules do not decide: Indeterminate linking, default linking, multiple CSs and competing rules -- 3.4. Parameterized linking rules and inconsistent diagnostics -- 4. Support for Parameterized Linking: Experimental data -- 5. Conclusions -- References -- Particle selection in Korean auxiliary formation* -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Preliminary issues -- 2.1. Grammaticalizing forms -- 2.2. Serial verb constructions -- 2.3. Particles -- 3. Auxiliaries from the existence verb issta -- 3.1. The past path -- 3.2. Diachronic development -- 3.3. The progressive path -- 3.4. The future path -- 4. Conclusion -- Abbreviations -- References -- Language use and auxiliary selection in the perfect* -- 1. Introduction -- 2. A usage-based model of language storage and processing -- 3. The role of frequency in the replacement of be in English -- 4. Auxiliary selection in German -- 4.1. The stability of auxiliary selection in German -- 4.2. The effects of frequency on the stability of auxiliary selection in German -- 5. Conclusion -- Appendix -- References -- Language index -- Name index -- Subject index -- The series Typological Studies in Language. 330 $aThe alternation between the auxiliaries BE and HAVE, which this collection examines, is often discussed in connection with generative analyses of split intransitivity. But this book's purpose is to place the phenomenon in a broader context. Well-known facts in the Romance and Germanic language families are extended with data from lesser studied languages and dialects (Romanian, Paduan), and also with experimental and historical data. Moreover, the book goes beyond the usual language families in which the phenomenon has been studied, with the inclusion of two chapters on Chinese and Korean. The theoretical background of the contributors is also broad, ranging from current Generative approaches to Cognitive and Optimality-Theoretical frameworks. Readers interested in the structural, historical, developmental, or experimental aspects of auxiliary selection should profit from this book's comprehensive empirical coverage and from the plurality of contemporary linguistic analyses it contains. 410 0$aTypological studies in language ;$vv. 69. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xAuxiliaries$vCongresses 606 $aLanguage and languages$xVariation$vCongresses 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xAuxiliaries 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xVariation 676 $a415 686 $a17.52$2bcl 686 $a17.14$2bcl 701 $aAranovich$b Raul$01800205 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961262003321 996 $aSplit auxiliary systems$94344851 997 $aUNINA