LEADER 01874nam 2200517 450 001 9910811894203321 005 20170816143257.0 010 $a1-4704-0055-3 035 $a(CKB)3360000000464662 035 $a(EBL)3113853 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000888851 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11456889 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000888851 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10866170 035 $a(PQKB)10538430 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3113853 035 $a(RPAM)1560647 035 $a(PPN)19541361X 035 $a(EXLCZ)993360000000464662 100 $a20140904h19921992 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aConstant mean curvature immersions of Enneper type /$fHenry C. Wente 210 1$aProvidence, Rhode Island :$cAmerican Mathematical Society,$d1992. 210 4$dİ1992 215 $a1 online resource (90 p.) 225 1 $aMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society,$x0065-9266 ;$vVolume 100, Number 478 300 $a"November 1992, volume 100, number 478 (first of 4 numbers)." 311 $a0-8218-2536-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Table of Contents""; ""I. Introduction""; ""II. The Differential Geometry""; ""III. H = 1/2 Immersions in R[sup(3)]""; ""IV. Minimal Surfaces in R[sup(3)]""; ""V. Minimal Surfaces in H[sup(3)]""; ""VI. Illustrations""; ""VII. Bibliography"" 410 0$aMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society ;$vVolume 100, Number 478. 606 $aMinimal surfaces 615 0$aMinimal surfaces. 676 $a516.3/62 700 $aWente$b Henry C.$f1936-$01607418 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910811894203321 996 $aConstant mean curvature immersions of Enneper type$93933686 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05503nam 2200721 a 450 001 9910969344603321 005 20240516100349.0 010 $a9786613424921 010 $a9781283424929 010 $a1283424924 010 $a9789027289148 010 $a902728914X 035 $a(CKB)2670000000139890 035 $a(EBL)832305 035 $a(OCoLC)769927253 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000592667 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12200841 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000592667 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10736264 035 $a(PQKB)10525040 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC832305 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL832305 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10524078 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL342492 035 $a(DE-B1597)721559 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789027289148 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000139890 100 $a20110921d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aPragmatics in practice /$fedited by Jan-Ola O?stman, Jef Verschueren 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (338 p.) 225 1 $aHandbook of pragmatics highlights (HoPH) ;$vv. 9 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9789027207869 311 08$a9027207860 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPragmatics in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; 1. Praxis; 2. Practical linguistics; 3. Pragmatics in practice'; 3.1 Everyday language use in practice; 3.2 Language and ethics; 3.3 Pragmatic adaptability in practice; 3.4 Linguistics 'applied'; 4. Towards responsibility in practice; Reference; Applied Linguistics; 1. Introduction; 2. The educational setting; 2.1 Child language and early literacy; 2.2 Classroom interaction; 2.3 Second and foreign language learning; 2.4 Teaching methodology and language testing; 2.5 Schooling and society 327 $a3. The economic-technical setting3.1 Improving written documents; 3.2 Studies of discourse in organizations; 4. Legal and bureaucratic settings; 4.1 Comprehensibility of legal and bureaucratic language; 4.2 Asymmetries in court and police encounters; 4.3 Forensic linguistics; 5. The medical-social setting; 6. The workplace; 6.1 Workplace interaction; 6.2 Conflicts and negotiations; 6.3 Discourse and technology; 7. Science and the academic setting; 7.1 The sociological-rhetorical study of scientific discourse; 7.2 The study of academic genres and writing; 7.3 Spoken discourse within academia 327 $a8. ConclusionReferences; Authenticity; 1. Introduction; 2. Historical background; 3. Understanding the concept; 3.1 Properties of authenticity; 3.2 Establishing authenticity; 3.3 Experiencing authenticity; 4. Authenticity and language; 4.1 The Romantic legacy; 4.2 Authenticating language; 5. Conclusions; References; Clinical Pragmatics; 1. The scope of clinical pragmatics; 2. Theoretical issues; 2.1 Is pragmatic impairment a neurological, cognitive or behavioural phenomenon?; 2.2 Modular vs interactionist theories of pragmatic impairment; 3. Describing pragmatic impairment 327 $a3.1 Pragmatic profiles3.2 Pragmatic theories and frameworks; 3.3 Neuropragmatics; 3.4 Cognitive pragmatics; 4. The range of pragmatic impairments; 4.1 Primary pragmatic impairment; 4.1.1 Right hemisphere damage; 4.1.2 Traumatic brain injury; 4.1.3 Dementia; 4.1.4 Schizophrenia; 4.1.5 Autistic spectrum disorder; 4.2 Secondary pragmatic impairment; 4.2.1 Nonfluent aphasia; 4.2.2 Fluent aphasia; 4.2.3 Specific Language Impairment; 4.2.4 Sensorimotor dysfunction; 5. Clinical pragmatics and pragmatic theory; Reference; Computer-mediated communication; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. CMC between speaking and writing3. Play and performance; 4. Communities; 5. Self-presentation and identities; 6. Conclusion; Reference; Contrastive analysis.; 1. The contrastive enterprise; 2. The unit of comparison; 3. The method; 4. The scope; 5. Macro-Contrastive Analysis; 6. Applications; Reference; Corpus analysis; 1. Introduction; 2. Corpus design and typology; 3. Corpus use and annotation; 4. Some websites and journals; 4.1 Corpus distribution centres; 4.2 General information with links to other sites; 4.3 Corpora; 4.4 Software; 4.5 Journals; Reference; Emphasis 327 $a1. Definition, problems 330 $aThe ten volumes of Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights focus on the most salient topics in the field of pragmatics, thereby attempting to divide up its wide interdisciplinary spectrum in a transparent and manageable way. While the other volumes select specific philosophical, cognitive, grammatical, social, cultural, discursive, variational, or interactional angles, this 9th volume focuses on what pragmatics is good for - beyond the very discipline of pragmatics as such. The chapters in the volume thus address the importance of taking a pragmatic perspective on traditional fields of applie 410 0$aHandbook of pragmatics highlights ;$vv. 9. 606 $aPragmatics 615 0$aPragmatics. 676 $a401/.45 686 $aER 940$qBVB$2rvk 701 $aO?stman$b Jan-Ola$0436528 701 $aVerschueren$b Jef$0158632 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910969344603321 996 $aPragmatics in practice$94346749 997 $aUNINA LEADER 07342nam 2200697Ia 450 001 9910961003803321 005 20251116141117.0 010 $a0-309-17158-X 010 $a1-280-18528-7 010 $a9786610185283 010 $a0-309-56357-7 035 $a(CKB)110986584753196 035 $a(EBL)3377214 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000276787 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11218873 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000276787 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10226499 035 $a(PQKB)11639207 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3377214 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3377214 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10068452 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL18528 035 $a(OCoLC)923267613 035 $a(BIP)53857870 035 $a(BIP)6847934 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584753196 100 $a20001218d2000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aAlternatives for high-level waste salt processing at the Savannah River Site /$fCommittee on Cesium Processing Alternatives for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2000 215 $a1 online resource (154 p.) 225 1 $aCompass series 300 $a"Support for this study was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FC01-99EW59049"--T.p. verso. 311 08$a0-309-07194-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGH-LEVEL WASTE SALT PROCESSING AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE""; ""Copyright""; ""Acknowledgements""; ""List of Report Reviewers""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""BACKGROUND ON THE HIGH-LEVEL WASTE PROGRAM AT SAVANNAH RIVER""; ""Waste Concentration and Storage""; ""Radionuclide Immobilization""; ""Extended Sludge Processing""; ""Salt Processing""; ""Salt Disposal""; ""ORIGIN OF THE CESIUM REMOVAL PROBLEM""; ""IDENTIFICATION OF PROCESSES FOR CESIUM REMOVAL""; ""Strontium/Actinide Removal by MST""; ""Tetraphenylborate Precipitation Process"" 327 $a""Crystalline Silicotitanate Ion Exchange""""Caustic Side Solvent Extraction""; ""Direct Disposal in Grout""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE'S INTERIM REPORT""; ""GENERIC ISSUES""; ""2 Screening Procedure""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""Literature and Patent Search""; ""Initial Selection of Process Alternatives (Phase I)""; ""Reduction of Process Alternatives to Four (Phase II)""; ""Selection of Recommended Process Alternative (Phases III and IV)""; ""ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS""; ""Literature and Patent Search""; ""Initial Selection of Process Alternatives (Phase I)"" 327 $a""Reduction of Process Alternatives to Four (Phase II)""""Selection of Recommended Process Alternative (Phases III and IV)""; ""GENERAL CONCLUSIONS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""3 Strontium and Actinide Removal""; ""BASELINE APPROACH""; ""STRONTIUM AND ACTINIDE REMOVAL""; ""MST SOLIDS REMOVAL""; ""GLASS COMPATIBILITY""; ""MST AVAILABILITY""; ""ALTERNATE PROCESSES""; ""R&D ACTIVITIES TO RESOLVE UNCERTAINTIES""; ""ANALYSIS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""4 Tetraphenylborate: In-Tank Precipitation and Small-Tank Precipitation Options""; ""In-Tank Precipitation Process""; ""Small-Tank TPB Precipitation"" 327 $a""ANALYSIS""""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""5 Crystalline Silicotitanate Ion Exchange""; ""PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND MINERALOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CST""; ""ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED FOR CST""; ""ANALYSIS""; ""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""6 Caustic Side Solvent-Extraction Process""; ""DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS""; ""ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""7 Direct Grout Option""; ""PROCESS DETAILS""; ""OBSTACLES TO SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION""; ""ANALYSIS""; ""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS"" 327 $a""8 Barriers to Implementation of HLW Salt Processing Options""""SYSTEMS INTEGRATION""; ""PROGRAM MANAGEMENT""; ""References""; ""Appendix A Biographical Sketches of Committee Members""; ""Appendix B Interim Report ""; ""ATTACHMENT A""; ""NRC Staff""; ""ATTACHMENT C""; ""HIGH-LEVEL WASTE SYSTEM AT SAVANNAH RIVER SITE""; ""SALT PROCESSING OPTIONS""; ""Appendix C Information-Gathering Meetings""; ""PRESENTATIONS GIVEN DURING FIRST COMMITTEE MEETING""; ""PRESENTATIONS GIVEN DURING SECOND COMMITTEE MEETING""; ""Appendix D Incidental Waste"" 327 $a""ROLE OF THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN INCIDENTAL WASTE DETERMINATIONS"" 330 $aThe Second World War introduced the world to nuclear weapons and their consequences. Behind the scene of these nuclear weapons and an aspect of their consequences is radioactive waste. Radioactive waste has varying degrees of harmfulness and poses a problem when it comes to storage and disposal. Radioactive waste is usually kept below ground in varying containers, which depend on how radioactive the waste it. High-level radioactive waste (HLW) can be stored in underground carbon-steel tanks. However, radioactive waste must also be further immobilized to ensure our safety. There are several sites in the United States where high-level radioactive waste (HLW) are stored; including the Savannah River Site (SRS), established in 1950 to produce plutonium and tritium isotopes for defense purposes. In order to further immobilize the radioactive waste at this site an in-tank precipitation (ITP) process is utilized. Through this method, the sludge portion of the tank wastes is being removed and immobilized in borosilicate glass for eventual disposal in a geological repository. As a result, a highly alkaline salt, present in both liquid and solid forms, is produced. The salt contains cesium, strontium, actinides such as plutonium and neptunium, and other radionuclides. But is this the best method? The National Research Council (NRC) has empanelled a committee, at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), to provide an independent technical review of alternatives to the discontinued in-tank precipitation (ITP) process for treating the HLW stored in tanks at the SRS. Alternatives for High-Level Waste Salt Processing at the Savannah RIver Site summarizes the finding of the committee which sought to answer 4 questions including: "Was an appropriately comprehensive set of cesium partitioning alternatives identified and are there other alternatives that should be explored?" and "Are there significant barriers to the implementation of any of the preferred alternatives, taking into account their state of development and their ability to be integrated into the existing SRS HLW system?" 410 0$aCompass series (Washington, D.C.) 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal 606 $aSalts 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal. 615 0$aSalts. 676 $a621.4838 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on Cesium Processing Alternatives for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961003803321 996 $aAlternatives for high-level waste salt processing at the Savannah River Site$94471845 997 $aUNINA