LEADER 00941nam0-22003011i-450- 001 990006844600403321 005 20001010 035 $a000684460 035 $aFED01000684460 035 $a(Aleph)000684460FED01 035 $a000684460 100 $a20001010d--------km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aIllegittimità costituzionale di una legge-provvedimento$eeffetti e rilevanza nella giurisdizione degli usi civici$fVincenzo Sica. 210 $aTorino$cUtet$d1962. 215 $a11 p.$d20 cm 300 $aEstr. da: Giurisprudenza italiana, 1962. Disp. 7, parte I, sez. I. 676 $a342 700 1$aSica,$bVincenzo$01849 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990006844600403321 952 $aBUSTA I B 589$b13353$fFSPBC 959 $aFSPBC 996 $aIllegittimità costituzionale di una legge-provvedimento$9626586 997 $aUNINA DB $aGEN01 LEADER 00877nam0-2200337---450- 001 990009637490403321 005 20121023123919.0 010 $a978-88-220-6829-3 035 $a000963749 035 $aFED01000963749 035 $a(Aleph)000963749FED01 035 $a000963749 100 $a20121023d2011----km-y0itay50------ba 101 1 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $a50 grandi idee$epolitica$fBen Dupré 210 $aBari$cDedalo$d2011 215 $a207 p.$d21 cm 225 1 $a50 grandi idee 300 $aTraduzione di Maristella Notaristefano 610 0 $aPolitica 676 $a320$v22$zita 700 1$aDupré,$bBen$0517966 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gREICAT$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990009637490403321 952 $aII F 363$b49156$fFSPBC 959 $aFSPBC 996 $a50 grandi idee$9848220 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03292nam 22009734a 450 001 9910960390503321 005 20250617195736.0 010 $a9780198034940 010 $a0198034946 010 $a0-19-803494-6 010 $a9786610501991 010 $a1-4337-0038-7 010 $a1-4237-6302-5 010 $a1-280-50199-5 010 $a0-19-515309-X 010 $a0-19-987061-6 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7034625 035 $a(CKB)24235111900041 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3052094 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC279771 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3052094 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10142475 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL50199 035 $a(OCoLC)560172223 035 $a(PPN)155696920 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7034625 035 $a(OCoLC)65198162 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL279771 035 $a(EXLCZ)9924235111900041 100 $a20020306d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAbortion and social responsibility $edepolarizing the debate /$fLaurie Shrage 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (xi, 173 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aStudies in feminist philosophy 311 08$a9780195153095 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 163-169) and index. 327 $aIs Roe viable? -- Liberty, equality, and abortion -- From reproductive choice to reproductive Barbie : the politics of visibility -- Conclusion: Abortion and democracy. 330 $aShrage argues that Roe v Wade's regulatory scheme of a six-month time span for abortion on demand polarized the public and obscured alternatives with potentially broader support. 410 0$aStudies in feminist philosophy. 517 3 $aDepolarizing the debate 606 $aAbortion$xMoral and ethical aspects$zUnited States 606 $aAbortion$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aAbortion 606 $aWomen's rights 606 $aPolitics, Practical 606 $aFeminism 606 $aAbortion, Legal$3(DNLM)D000029 606 $aWomen's Rights$3(DNLM)D014933 606 $aFetal Viability$3(DNLM)D005328 606 $aGovernment Regulation$3(DNLM)D033161 606 $aPolitics$3(DNLM)D011057 606 $aSocioeconomic Factors$3(DNLM)D012959 606 $aSupreme Court Decisions$3(DNLM)D035521 606 $aFeminism$3(DNLM)D019513 607 $aUnited States 615 0$aAbortion$xMoral and ethical aspects 615 0$aAbortion$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aAbortion. 615 0$aWomen's rights. 615 0$aPolitics, Practical. 615 0$aFeminism 615 12$aAbortion, Legal. 615 22$aWomen's Rights. 615 22$aFetal Viability. 615 22$aGovernment Regulation. 615 22$aPolitics. 615 22$aSocioeconomic Factors. 615 22$aSupreme Court Decisions. 615 22$aFeminism. 676 $a179.7/6/0973 700 $aShrage$b Laurie$f1953-$01827020 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910960390503321 996 $aAbortion and social responsibility$94395067 997 $aUNINA