LEADER 05754nam 22006854a 450 001 9910959950803321 005 20251116141033.0 010 $a9786610185665 010 $a9780309184588 010 $a0309184584 010 $a9781280185663 010 $a128018566X 010 $a9780309593823 010 $a0309593824 010 $a9780585198057 010 $a0585198055 035 $a(CKB)110986584752868 035 $a(OCoLC)559415140 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10054993 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000140005 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11146867 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000140005 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10028508 035 $a(PQKB)10283810 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3376002 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3376002 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10054993 035 $a(OCoLC)923260376 035 $a(Perlego)4738411 035 $a(BIP)6145680 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584752868 100 $a20000314d1999 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aDisposition of high-level radioactive waste through geological isolation $edevelopment, current status, and technical and policy challenges /$fSteering Committee, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc1999 215 $a1 online resource (42 p.) 225 1 $aThe compass series 300 $a"Discussion paper prepared for the workshop to be held at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the National Academies, Irvine, California on November 4-5, 1999." 311 08$a9780309067782 311 08$a0309067782 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 33-34). 327 $aDisposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste through Geological Isolation -- Copyright -- Preface -- Contents -- Management of High-Level Waste: A Historical Overview of the Technical and Policy Challenges -- WHAT IS HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE? A BRIEF HISTORY -- THE QUANTITY OF HIGH-LEVEL WASTE TO BE MANAGED -- ASSURING THE SAFETY OF A GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY FOR HIGH-LEVEL WASTE -- ACHIEVING PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF HIGH-LEVEL WASTE REPOSITORIES. -- ALTERNATIVES TO A GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY -- DISPOSAL VS. DISPOSITION -- SAFETY AGAINST HUMAN INTRUSION -- THE EVOLVING BALANCE BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL EFFORTS -- An Overview of the Workshop Agenda -- PLENARY SESSIONS -- ARRANGEMENTS AND TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION SESSIONS -- KEY ISSUES FOR THE WORKSHOP. -- DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCUSSION SESSIONS -- Session 1: Role of Total System Performance Assessment in Establishing the Acceptability of Geologic Repositories: An? -- Session Structure -- Session 2: Timing and Staging Repository Development: Maintaining Technical and Social Balance in Stepwise Development from? -- Session Structure -- Session 3: The Regulator's Dilemma: Decision Making in the Presence of Uncertainty -- Session Structure -- Session 4: Public Acceptance in the Context of Social Distrust. -- Session Structure -- Session 5: Lessons Learned from National Programs: Tracing Routes to Success or Setback -- Session Structure -- Session 6: Is Geological Disposal Required? -- Session Structure -- Session 7: Making Progress through International Cooperation -- Session Structure -- CONCLUSION. -- Bibliography. 330 $aDuring the next several years, decisions are expected to be made in several countries on the further development and implementation of the geological disposition option. The Board on Radioactive Waste Management (BRWM) of the U.S. National Academies believes that informed and reasoned discussion of relevant scientific, engineering and social issues can-and should-play a constructive role in the decision process by providing information to decision makers on relevant technical and policy issues. A BRWM-initiated project including a workshop at Irvine, California on November 4-5, 1999, and subsequent National Academies' report to be published in spring, 2000, are intended to provide such information to national policy makers both in the U.S. and abroad. To inform national policies, it is essential that experts from the physical, geological, and engineering sciences, and experts from the policy and social science communities work together. Some national programs have involved social science and policy experts from the beginning, while other programs have only recently recognized the importance of this collaboration. An important goal of the November workshop is to facilitate dialogue between these communities, as well as to encourage the sharing of experiences from many national programs. The workshop steering committee has prepared this discussion for participants at the workshop. It should elicit critical comments and help identify topics requiring in-depth discussion at the workshop. It is not intended as a statement of findings, conclusions, or recommendations. It is rather intended as a vehicle for stimulating dialogue among the workshop participants. Out of that dialogue will emerge the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the National Academies' report. 410 0$aCompass series (Washington, D.C.) 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal in the ground 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal in the ground. 676 $a363.72/89 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bBoard on Radioactive Waste Management. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910959950803321 996 $aDisposition of high-level radioactive waste through geological isolation$94361182 997 $aUNINA