LEADER 03836nam  2200697Ia 450 
001 9910959700203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-8173-8219-4
024 7 $a2027/heb31839
035   $a(CKB)1000000000537506
035   $a(EBL)438212
035   $a(OCoLC)427509620
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000360281
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12111100
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000360281
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10317311
035   $a(PQKB)11642903
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000158130
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11164000
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000158130
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10147183
035   $a(PQKB)11698855
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse8642
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL438212
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10237166
035   $a(dli)HEB31839
035   $a(MiU)  MIU01100000000000000000192
035   $a(MiU)MIU01100000000000000000192
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC438212
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000537506
100   $a20030116d2003      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aFree speech on trial $ecommunication perspectives on landmark Supreme Court decisions /$fedited by Richard A. Parker
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aTuscaloosa, AL $cUniversity of Alabama Press$dc2003
215   $a1 online resource (356 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a0-8173-1301-X 
311 08$a0-8173-5025-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $aIntroduction / Franklyn S. Haiman -- Communication studies and free speech law / Richard A. Parker -- Schenck v. United States and Abrams v. United States / Stephen A. Smith -- Whitney v. California / Juliet Dee -- Stromberg v. California / John S. Gossett -- Near v. Minnesota / John S. Gossett and Juliet Dee -- Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire / Dale Herbeck -- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette / Warren Sandmann -- New York Times v. Sullivan / Nicholas F. Burnett -- United States v. O'Brien / Donald A. Fishman -- Brandenburg v. Ohio / Richard A. Parker -- Cohen v. California / Susan J. Balter-Reitz -- Kleindienst v. Mandel / Mary Elizabeth Bezanson -- Miller v. California / Joseph Tuman -- Buckley v. Valeo / Craig R. Smith -- FCC v. Pacifica Foundation / R. Wilfred Tremblay -- Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. Public Service Commission / Joseph J. Hemmer Jr. -- Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier / Andrew H. Utterback -- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell / Edward C. Brewer -- Texas v. Johnson / David J. Vergobbi -- Reno v. ACLU / Douglas Fraleigh -- Conclusion / Ann M. Gill.
330   $a Describes landmark free speech decisions of the Supreme Court while highlighting the issues of language, rhetoric, and communication that underlie them.  At the intersection of communication and First Amendment law reside two significant questions: What is the speech we ought to protect, and why should we protect it? The 20 scholars of legal communication whose essays are gathered in this volume propose various answers to these questions, but their essays share an abiding concern with a constitutional guarantee of free speech and its symbiotic relationship with commu
517 3 $aCommunication perspectives on landmark Supreme Court decisions
606   $aCivil rights$zUnited States$vCases
606   $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States$vCases
615  0$aCivil rights
615  0$aFreedom of speech
676   $a342.73/0853
676   $a342.730853
701   $aParker$b Richard A$g(Richard Anthony),$f1945-$01794002
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910959700203321
996   $aFree speech on trial$94334508
997   $aUNINA