LEADER 03706nam 22007092 450 001 9910959208903321 005 20151005020621.0 010 $a1-280-43647-6 010 $a0-511-17803-4 010 $a0-511-04261-2 010 $a0-511-14854-2 010 $a0-511-30538-9 010 $a0-511-48235-3 010 $a0-511-04583-2 035 $a(CKB)1000000000006026 035 $a(EBL)202183 035 $a(OCoLC)559323857 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000220494 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11196548 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000220494 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10157485 035 $a(PQKB)10742595 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511482359 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC202183 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL202183 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10030936 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL43647 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000006026 100 $a20090216d2002|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPetronius and the anatomy of fiction /$fVictoria Rimell 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2002. 215 $a1 online resource (x, 239 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 08$a0-521-03701-8 311 08$a0-521-81586-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 210-226) and indexes. 327 $tIntroduction: Corporealities --$g1.$tRhetorical red herrings --$g2.$tBehind the scenes --$g3.$tThe beast within --$g4.$tFrom the horse's mouth --$g5.$tBella intestina --$g6.$tRegurgitating Polyphemus --$g7.$tScars of knowledge --$g8.$tHow to eat Virgil --$g9.$tGhost stories --$g10.$tDecomposing rhythms --$tConclusion: Licence and labyrinths --$gApp. I.$tThe use of fundere and cognates in the Satyricon --$gApp. II.$tThe occurrence of fortuna or Fortuna in the Satyricon --$gApp. III.$tAen. 4.39 at Sat. 112: nec venit in mentem, quorum consderis arvis? 330 $aPetronius' Satyricon, long regarded as the first 'novel' of the Western tradition, has always sparked controversy. It has been puzzled over as a strikingly modernist riddle, elevated as a work of exemplary comic realism, condemned as obscene and repackaged as a morality tale. This reading of the surviving portions of the work shows how the Satyricon fuses the anarchic and the classic, the comic and the disturbing, and presents readers with a labyrinth of narratorial viewpoints. Dr Rimell argues that the surviving fragments are connected by an imagery of disintegration, focused on the pervasive Neronian metaphor of the literary text as a human or animal body. Throughout, she discusses the limits of dominant twentieth-century views of the Satyricon as bawdy pantomime, and challenges prevailing restrictions of Petronian corporeality to material or non-metaphorical realms. This 'novel' emerges as both very Roman and very satirical in its 'intestinal' view of reality. 517 3 $aPetronius & the Anatomy of Fiction 606 $aSatire, Latin$xHistory and criticism 606 $aNarration (Rhetoric)$xHistory$yTo 1500 606 $aFiction$xTechnique 606 $aRhetoric, Ancient 607 $aRome$xIn literature 615 0$aSatire, Latin$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aNarration (Rhetoric)$xHistory 615 0$aFiction$xTechnique. 615 0$aRhetoric, Ancient. 676 $a873/.01 700 $aRimell$b Victoria$0451750 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910959208903321 996 $aPetronius and the anatomy of fiction$9157392 997 $aUNINA