LEADER 01446oam 2200217z- 450 001 9910587588203321 010 $a0-243-65844-3 035 $a(CKB)5470000001173895 035 $a(VLeBooks)9780243658442 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000001173895 100 $a20221206c1971uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 200 $aSlave Trade in Africa in 1872: Principally Carried on for the Supply of Turkey, Egypt, Persia and Zanzibar 210 $cLondon: Edward Marsh 215 $a1 online resource (1 p.) 330 $aWhilst the greatest effort has been made to ensure the quality of this text, due to the historical nature of this content, in some rare cases there may be minor issues with legibility. On December 31st, 1868, the Mixed Commission Court established at the Cape of Good Hope by the Govern ments of Great Britain, the United States, and Portugal, declared that it had not been called upon to judge one single case of slave-trade during the year then closing. In consequence of this, Lord Clarendon announced that these three nations had concluded to discontinue the Commission. There could be no longer any reason for its continuance, as the slave-trade was abolished on the western coasts of Africa. 700 $aBerlioux$b Etienne Felix$0679982 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910587588203321 996 $aSlave Trade in Africa in 1872: Principally Carried on for the Supply of Turkey, Egypt, Persia and Zanzibar$94173767 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02374nam 2200661 a 450 001 9910958679603321 005 20251117092844.0 010 $a0-8132-2074-2 010 $a0-8132-0932-3 035 $a(CKB)2670000000310027 035 $a(EBL)3135002 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000851437 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11522349 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000851437 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10847755 035 $a(PQKB)10101084 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000781894 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12337972 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000781894 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10735420 035 $a(PQKB)10931784 035 $a(OCoLC)815970854 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse24193 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3135002 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10642468 035 $a(OCoLC)922996916 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3135002 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000310027 100 $a19960401d1996 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAquinas and analogy /$fRalph McInerny 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cCatholic University of America Press$dc1996 215 $a1 online resource (169 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a0-8132-0848-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 165-166) and index. 327 $apt. 1. Prolegomena -- pt. 2. Analogous names. 330 $aThe basic distinctions McInerny introduces, his criticism of the central piece in the literature, Cajetan's De nominum analogia, the applications he makes to problems such as that of the nature of metaphysics or of logic, his knowledge of contemporary debates on related topics, combine to make his contribution unique. 606 $aAnalogy$xHistory 606 $aAnalogy (Religion)$xHistory of doctrines$yMiddle Ages, 600-1500 606 $aAnalogy (Religion)$xHistory of doctrines$y16th century 615 0$aAnalogy$xHistory. 615 0$aAnalogy (Religion)$xHistory of doctrines 615 0$aAnalogy (Religion)$xHistory of doctrines 676 $a169/.092 700 $aMcInerny$b Ralph$f1929-2010.$0452305 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910958679603321 996 $aAquinas and analogy$9919285 997 $aUNINA