LEADER 00894nam0-22003131i-450- 001 990007375030403321 005 20021128 035 $a000737503 035 $aFED01000737503 035 $a(Aleph)000737503FED01 035 $a000737503 100 $a20021128d1966----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $a<>urban transportation problem$fJ.R. Meyer, J.F. Kain, M. Wohl 210 $aCambridge (Mass.)$cHarvard University Press$d1966 215 $aXIX, 427 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aHarvard paperback 700 1$aMeyer,$bJohn R.$f<1927?2009> 701 1$aKain,$bJohn F.$0121193 701 1$aWohl,$bMartin$0266457 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990007375030403321 952 $aXV H 903$b81882$fFGBC 959 $aFGBC 996 $aUrban transportation problem$9449504 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00933nam0-22003131i-450- 001 990002030260403321 005 20090410113337.0 035 $a000203026 035 $aFED01000203026 035 $a(Aleph)000203026FED01 035 $a000203026 100 $a20030910g19111939km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $ager 200 1 $aLepidopterorum Catalogus$fed. by Chr Aurivillius, H. Wagner, Embrik Strand, F. Bryk 210 $aBerlin$cJunk$d1911-1939 215 $av.$d25 cm 610 0 $aLepidotteri$aCataloghi 676 $a595.78 702 1$aAurivillius,$bPer Olof Christopher$f<1853-1928> 702 1$aBryk,$bFelix 702 1$aStrand,$bEmbrik$f<1876-1947> 702 1$aWagner,$bHans$c 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990002030260403321 952 $a61 COLLANA 58$b608$fDAGEN 959 $aDAGEN 996 $aLepidopterorum Catalogus$9404936 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04400nam 2200709Ia 450 001 9910958423603321 005 20251116150917.0 010 $a9780309165273 010 $a030916527X 010 $a9780309547871 010 $a0309547873 035 $a(CKB)1000000000030443 035 $a(OCoLC)606925837 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10078087 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000283758 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11254186 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000283758 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10250653 035 $a(PQKB)10030190 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3377895 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3377895 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10078087 035 $a(OCoLC)923273933 035 $a(Perlego)4732884 035 $a(BIP)53859233 035 $a(BIP)12479145 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000030443 100 $a20050411d2005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aRisk and decisions about disposition of transuranic and high-level radioactive waste /$fCommittee on Risk-Based Approaches for Disposition of Transuranic and High-Level Radioactive Waste ; Board on Radioactive Waste Management ; Division on Earth and Life Studies ; National Research Council of the National Academies 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academies Press$dc2005 215 $a1 online resource (229 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9780309095495 311 08$a0309095492 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 149-162). 327 $aIntro -- List of Report Reviewers -- Preface -- Contents -- Executive Summary -- 1 Introduction and Background -- 2 Why Consider Flexibility in Disposal Options? -- 3 Exemption Process -- 4 A Risk-Informed Approach: Procedures and Criteria for Risk Assessment to Support an Exemption Process -- 5 Impediments to a Successful Application of the Risk-Informed Approach -- 6 Findings and Recommendations -- References -- Appendixes -- Appendix A Overview: Risk Assessment -- Appendix B Summary of Previous Studies and Programs Aimed at Incorporating Risk into DOE Environmental Management Decision Making -- Appendix C Information-Gathering Meetings -- Appendix D Glossary -- Appendix E Biographical Sketches of Committee Members. 330 $aThe U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manages dozens of sites across the nation that focus on research, design, and production of nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors for defense applications. Radioactive wastes at these sites pose a national challenge, and DOE is considering how to most effectively clean them up. Some of the greatest projected risks, cleanup costs, and technical challenges come from processing and disposing transuranic and high-level radioactive waste. This report addresses how DOE should incorporate risk into decisions about whether the nation should use alternatives to deep geologic disposal for some of these wastes. It recommends using an exemption process involving risk assessment for determining how to dispose of problematic wastes. The report outlines criteria for risk assessment and key elements of a risk-informed approach. The report also describes the types of wastes that are candidates for alternative disposition paths, potential alternatives to deep geologic disposal for disposition of low-hazard waste, and whether these alternatives are compatible with current regulations. 517 3 $aRisks and decisions about disposition of transuranic and high-level radioactive waste 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal$xRisk assessment$zUnited States 606 $aRadioactive waste sites$xCleanup 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal$zUnited States 606 $aRadioactive wastes$xManagement 606 $aRadioactive wastes$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal$xRisk assessment 615 0$aRadioactive waste sites$xCleanup. 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal 615 0$aRadioactive wastes$xManagement. 615 0$aRadioactive wastes$xEnvironmental aspects. 676 $a363.72/89 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910958423603321 996 $aRisk and decisions about disposition of transuranic and high-level radioactive waste$94356694 997 $aUNINA