LEADER 03121nam  2200637Ia 450 
001 9910957966003321
005 20240912154404.0
010   $a0-19-028608-3
010   $a0-19-773620-3
010   $a1-280-48121-8
010   $a0-19-534999-7
010   $a1-4337-0087-5
035   $a(CKB)1000000000245641
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000203147
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11181361
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000203147
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10257832
035   $a(PQKB)11001454
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1591281
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10103513
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL48121
035   $a(OCoLC)922907479
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1591281
035   $a(BIP)120374647
035   $a(BIP)8569222
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000245641
100   $a20030325d2005      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 04$aThe mind as a scientific object $ebetween brain and culture /$fedited by Christina E. Erneling and David Martel Johnson
210   $aNew York ;$aOxford $cOxford University Press$d2005
215   $axiii, 549 p. $cill
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 08$a0-19-513933-X 
311 08$a0-19-513932-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
330   $aWhat holds together the various fields that are supposed to consititute the general intellectual discipline that people now call cognitive science? In this book, Erneling and Johnson identify two problems with defining this discipline. First, some theorists identify the common subject matter as the mind, but scientists and philosophers have not been able to agree on any single, satisfactory answer to the question of what the mind is. Second, those who speculate about the general characteristics that belong to cognitive science tend to assume that all the particular fields falling under the rubric--psychology, linguistics, biology, and son on--are of roughly equal value in their ability to shed light on the nature of mind. This book argues that all the cognitive science disciplines are not equally able to provide answers to ontological questions about the mind, but rather that only neurophysiology and cultural psychology are suited to answer these questions. However, since the cultural account of mind has long been ignored in favor of the neurophysiological account, Erneling and Johnson bring together contributions that focus especially on different versions of the cultural account of the mind.
606   $aCognitive science
606   $aIntellect$xSocial aspects
606   $aCognition$xSocial aspects
615  0$aCognitive science.
615  0$aIntellect$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aCognition$xSocial aspects.
676   $a153
701   $aErneling$b Christina E.$f1951-$01851644
701   $aJohnson$b David Martel$01851645
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910957966003321
996   $aThe mind as a scientific object$94445808
997   $aUNINA