LEADER 02475nam 2200577 450 001 9910786664603321 005 20230803203451.0 010 $a1-4438-6323-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000000149660 035 $a(EBL)1725924 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001411074 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11838529 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001411074 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11400564 035 $a(PQKB)10811608 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1725924 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1725924 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10898109 035 $a(OCoLC)882778579 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB148401 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000149660 100 $a20140809h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aJurisprudence of international criminal justice /$fFarhad Malekian 210 1$aNewcastle upon Tyne, [England] :$cCambridge Scholars Publishing,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (797 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4438-5360-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aTABLE OF CONTENTS; ABSTRACT; INTRODUCTION; FOREWORD; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; CHAPTER FOUR; CHAPTER FIVE; CHAPTER SIX; CHAPTER SEVEN; CHAPTER EIGHT; CHAPTER NINE; CHAPTER TEN; CHAPTER ELEVEN; CHAPTER TWELVE; APPENDIX A; APPENDIX B; APPENDIX C; BIBLIOGRAPHY 330 $aIntroduction written by Professor Benjamin B Ferencz This challenging volume examines the jurisprudence of international criminal justice from various points of view. The philosophy of justice may vary from time to time and from nation to nation, depending on prevailing attitudes towards the substantive rules which deal, in one way or another, with cultural norms. In the national and international area, the principles of criminal justice have a key role in examining the scope of the most ser... 606 $aCriminal justice, Administration of 606 $aInternational criminal law 606 $aJurisprudence 615 0$aCriminal justice, Administration of. 615 0$aInternational criminal law. 615 0$aJurisprudence. 676 $a364 700 $aMalekian$b Farhad$0230795 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786664603321 996 $aJurisprudence of international criminal justice$93743818 997 $aUNINA LEADER 06555nam 2200601 a 450 001 9910957470503321 005 20251117090934.0 010 $a1-62100-316-7 035 $a(CKB)2550000000046554 035 $a(EBL)3021972 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000569028 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12290420 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000569028 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10541266 035 $a(PQKB)10949455 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3021972 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3021972 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10686296 035 $a(OCoLC)750174765 035 $a(BIP)33187691 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000046554 100 $a20110104d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aFederal courthouse construction /$fMatthew C. Carrasco, editor 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aNew York $cNova Science Publishers, Inc.$dc2011 215 $a1 online resource (152 p.) 225 1 $aCongressional policies, practices and procedures 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a1-61209-316-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntro -- FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION -- FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION -- CONTENTS -- PREFACE -- Chapter 1 FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION: BETTER PLANNING, OVERSIGHT, AND COURTROOM SHARING NEEDED TO ADDRESS FUTURE COSTS -- WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY -- WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS -- WHAT GAO FOUND -- ABBREVIATIONS -- BACKGROUND -- EXTRA SPACE IN COURTHOUSES COST AN ESTIMATED 835 MILLION IN CONSTANT 2010 DOLLARS TO CONSTRUCT AND 51 MILLION ANNUALLY TO RENT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN -- MOST COURTHOUSES EXCEED CONGRESSIONALLY AUTHORIZED SIZE DUE TO A LACK OF OVERSIGHT BY GSA -- Most Federal Courthouses Constructed since 2000 Exceed Authorized Size, Some by Substantial Amounts -- Most of the Courthouses That Exceeded Authorized Size by 10 Percent or More Also Exceeded Budget Estimates -- Increase in Overall Size Consisted of Increases in Building Common and Tenant Spaces -- GSA Lacked Sufficient Oversight and Controls to Ensure That Courthouses Were Planned and Built According to Authorized Size -- Lack of GSA Oversight Contributed to More Building Common Space than Planned -- A Lack of GSA Oversight Contributed to Some Courthouses Being Built with Larger Tenant Spaces -- Recently, GSA Has Taken Some Steps to Improve Oversight of Courthouse Size -- ESTIMATED SPACE NEEDS EXCEEDED ACTUAL SPACE NEEDS, RESULTING IN COURTHOUSES THAT WERE LARGER THAN NECESSARY -- Because the Judiciary Overestimated the Number of Judges, Courthouses Have Much Extra Space after 10 Years -- Judiciary Planning Overstated the Need for Space through Inaccurate Caseload Projections and Allocations of Space for Visiting Judges -- The Judiciary's Method of Estimating Judges Does Not Account for Uncertainty in When Judges Will Take Senior Status and in How Many New Judgeships Will Be Authorized. 327 $aLOW LEVELS OF USE SHOW THAT JUDGES COULD SHARE COURTROOMS, REDUCING THE NEED FOR FUTURE COURTROOMS BY MORE THAN ONE-THIRD -- Courtrooms Assigned to One Judge Are Used a Quarter of the Time or Less for Case Proceedings -- Increased Courtroom Sharing Is Feasible and Could Reduce the Need for Courtrooms by More than One-Third -- Some Judges Said They Could Overcome the Challenges to Courtroom Sharing -- The Judiciary Has Taken Some Steps to Increase Sharing in Future Courthouse Projects -- CONCLUSIONS -- RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION -- AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION -- GSA Comments -- AOUSC Comments -- APPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY -- APPENDIX II. COMMENTS FROM THE U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION -- GAO Comments -- APPENDIX III. COMMENTS FROM THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY -- GAO Comments -- End Notes -- Chapter 2 STATEMENT OF JUDGE MICHAEL A. PONSOR, CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON SPACE AND FACILITIES, BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS AND COMPETITION POLICY, HEARING ON "COURTROOM USE: ACCESS TO JUSTICE, EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, AND COURTROOM SECURITY" -- INTRODUCTION -- The Courthouse Construction Program -- The Judiciary's Courtroom Sharing Policies -- The Impact of GAO's Courtroom Simulation Model on Access to Justice -- CONCLUSION -- End Notes -- Chapter 3 STATEMENT OF ROBERT A. PECK, COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE, U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS AND COMPETITION POLICY, HEARING ON "FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION" -- Chapter 4 STATEMENT OF JUDGE ROBERT JAMES CONRAD, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS AND COMPETITION POLICY, HEARING ON "COURTROOM USE: ACCESS TO JUSTICE, EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, AND COURTROOM SECURITY" -- INTRODUCTION -- FEDERAL COURTS ARE PLACES OF DIGNITY AND DELIBERATION. 327 $aTHE COURTROOM IS AN ESSENTIAL TOOL IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS -- COURTHOUSES MUST ALSO BE SAFE AND SECURE -- THE CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA COURTHOUSE -- Courtroom 3 (Our "L" shaped Courtroom) -- Courtrooms One and Two -- Security Concerns -- Condition Concerns -- CONCLUSION -- Chapter 5 FEDERAL COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION -- SUMMARY -- BACKGROUND2 -- CONGRESSIONAL FUNDING FOR COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION -- FY2009 Funding -- RECENT CONSIDERATIONS -- End Notes -- CHAPTER SOURCES -- INDEX -- Blank Page. 330 $aThe General Services Administration (GSA) is the primary federal real property agency, with responsibility for the design, construction and maintenance of federal buildings and courthouses. The determination for new courthouse construction is based on a five-year assessment of anticipated space requirements compiled by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, which is updated and approved each year by the Judicial Conference of the United States. This book examines federal courthouse construction planning, oversight and the issue of courtroom sharing needed to address future costs 410 0$aCongressional policies, practices and procedures series. 606 $aCourthouses$zUnited States$xPlanning 606 $aCourthouses$zUnited States$xDesign and construction 615 0$aCourthouses$xPlanning. 615 0$aCourthouses$xDesign and construction. 676 $a347.73/200682 701 $aCarrasco$b Matthew C$01865476 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910957470503321 996 $aFederal courthouse construction$94472595 997 $aUNINA