LEADER 01248nam0-22003731i-450- 001 990006991360403321 005 20111018190137.0 010 $a88-14-08587-0 035 $a000699136 035 $aFED01000699136 035 $a(Aleph)000699136FED01 035 $a000699136 100 $a20111018d2000----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $a<>Tribunale di primo grado e la litigiosità comunitaria$eun'indagine sociologico-giuridica$fMaria Cristina Reale$gprefazione di Vincenzo Ferrari 210 $aMilano$cGiuffrè$dc2000 215 $aXVIII, 206 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aStudi di sociologia del diritto$fUniversità di Milano, Facoltà di giurisprudenza, Istituto di filosofia e sociologia del diritto$v10 676 $a341.55$v20$zita 700 1$aReale,$bMaria Cristina$0257223 702 1$aFerrari,$bVincenzo 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990006991360403321 952 $aUNIVERSITÀ 468 (10)$b41849*$fFGBC 952 $aXI FSDM 10$fDFD 952 $aXV A 158$b4376$fDDCIC 959 $aDFD 959 $aFGBC 959 $aDDCIC 996 $aTribunale di primo grado e la litigiosità comunitaria$9698560 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03638nam 22008051c 450 001 9910956532403321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a9786610808908 010 $a9781472559265 010 $a1472559266 010 $a9781280808906 010 $a128080890X 010 $a9781847311658 010 $a1847311652 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472559265 035 $a(CKB)1000000000338622 035 $a(EBL)270669 035 $a(OCoLC)476004603 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000267825 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12049907 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000267825 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10208386 035 $a(PQKB)10319711 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772363 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC270669 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1772363 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10275963 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL80890 035 $a(OCoLC)893332025 035 $a(OCoLC)646796620 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255769 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL270669 035 $a(OCoLC)191697747 035 $a(UtOrBLW)BP9781472559265BC 035 $a(Perlego)809892 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000338622 100 $a20140929d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 12$aA virtue less cloistered $ecourts, speech, and constitutions $fIan Cram 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2002. 215 $a1 online resource (264 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9781841130385 311 08$a1841130389 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The Landscape of Justiciable Problems -- Chapter 3. Strategies for Resolving Justiciable Problems -- Chapter 4. The Response to Problems of Different Types -- Chapter 5. Outcomes -- Chapter 6. Fulfilling Objectives? -- Chapter 7. Experiences and Perceptions of the Legal System -- Chapter 8. Paths to Justice: Which Way Now? 330 8 $aWhilst paying lip service to the importance of public access to court proceedings and its corollary of unfettered media reporting,a trawl through common law jurisdictions reveals that judges and legislators have been responsible for substantial inroads into the ideal of open justice. Outside of the US, judges and legislators have long subordinated media freedom to report and comment upon matters relating to the administration of justice in order to safeguard the fairness of individual proceedings, public confidence in the administration of justice more generally or even individual privacy concerns. The subject matter of this book is a comparative treatment of constitutional protection for open justice. Focusing on developments in the legal systems of the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Australia, the monograph draws upon the constitutionalization of expression interests across the common law world to engage in a much needed re-assessment of the basis and extent of permissible restraints on speech 606 $aCourts 606 $2IT & Communications law 606 $aFreedom of speech 606 $aFreedom of the press 606 $aFree press and fair trial 615 0$aCourts. 615 0$aFreedom of speech. 615 0$aFreedom of the press. 615 0$aFree press and fair trial. 676 $a342.08/53 700 $aCram$b Ian$0597332 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910956532403321 996 $aA virtue less cloistered$94469829 997 $aUNINA