LEADER 07034nam 2200709 a 450 001 9910955858803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786612151941 010 $a9781282151949 010 $a1282151940 010 $a9789027291264 010 $a9027291268 024 7 $a10.1075/la.108 035 $a(CKB)1000000000534953 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000105483 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11114414 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000105483 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10104798 035 $a(PQKB)11631170 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC622241 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL622241 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10206165 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL215194 035 $a(OCoLC)648331536 035 $a(DE-B1597)721022 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789027291264 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000534953 100 $a20070501d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aArgument structure /$fedited by Eric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Giorgos Spathas 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub.$dc2007 215 $axvii, 243 p. $cill 225 1 $aLinguistik aktuell =$aLinguistics today,$x0166-0829 ;$vv. 108 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9789027233721 311 08$a9027233721 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aArgument Structure -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Preface -- List of contributors -- Introduction -- References -- Do verbs have argument structure? -- 1. Background and aims -- 2. Frames -- 3. Made-up verbs -- 4. The verb's flexibility -- 5. A brief note on the role of lexical semantics in syntactic theory -- References -- Projecting argument structure -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Background -- 2.1 Full Interpretation -- 3. Contact verbs -- 3.1 Contact as change -- 3.2 Contact activities -- 3.3 Alternating contact verbs -- 4. Conclusion -- References -- The argument structure of the dative construction -- 1. The dative construction and its alternates -- 2. Dravidian has no adjective -- 3. The dative construction in English -- 4. The possessive construction in English and Hungarian -- 5. A Lexical Relational Structure (LRS) for Experiencer and Possessor theta roles -- 6. The genesis of adjectives -- References -- Syntactic categories and lexical argument structure -- 1. Syntactic categories and argument structure -- 2. Case and the category P -- 3. Postpositions and adjectives in Kannada -- 4. The licensing of imperfect and perfect participles -- 5. Dative experiencer predicates as arguments of nouns -- References -- Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce -- 1. Introduction -- 2. P as a universal category -- 2.1 Adposition-like words crosslinguistically -- 2.2 Identifying P in different languages -- 2.2.1 English -- 2.2.2 Chinese -- 2.2.3 Northern Sámi -- 2.3 Cross-linguistic generalizations -- 3. Figure and Ground -- 3.1 Adposition and Ground -- 3.2 Particles -- 3.2.1 Particle and category -- 3.2.2 Particles and constituency -- 3.2.3 Particles and c-selection -- 3.2.4 Particles and s-selection -- 4. Non-spatial P -- 4.1 Metaphorical extensions of spatial P -- 4.2 Grammatical P -- 4.3 Case markers. 327 $a5. Adpositions and verbs -- 5.1 Split-V and Split-P -- 5.2 Arguments of V -- 5.3 Ground in motion -- 5.4 Tense versus specifiers -- 6. Conclusion -- Abbreviations -- References -- Argument structure and aspect -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The two imperfectives -- 3. Mohanan and Mohanan's analysis of aa constructions -- 3.1 The presupposition effect -- 4. Unaccusatives and eventive v -- 4.1 The contrast between the -ukayaa and the -unnu constructions -- 5. Manner adverbs: Further evidence for a focus effect -- 5.1 The position of adverbs -- 6. Summary -- References -- Argument features, clausal structure and the computation -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Background: Case is not a driving force - Person and EPP are -- 3. The structural cases are interpretable -- 4. Grammar is event-speech matching -- 4.1 Clausal architecture I: background -- 4.2 Clausal architecture II: extensions -- 4.3 Evidence: the mysterious First Position Constraint -- 5. Logophoric matching and speech event binding: some initial observations -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- On theta role assignment by feature checking -- 1. Thematic roles in minimalist theory: a problem? -- 2. Fanselow's (2001) arguments against scrambling of argument DPs -- 2.1 Floating quantifiers -- 2.2 Parasitic gaps -- 2.3 Freezing effects -- 2.4 Wh- phrases in situ -- 2.5 Reconstruction -- 2.6 Quantifier scope -- 3. The alternative proposal: the head F that attracts an object -- 4. Scrambling and focus: Kidwai (2000) -- 5. "Theta feature" checking and Attract: Manzini and Roussou (2000) -- 6. The analysis of theta roles as feature bundles -- 7. "Theta features" and thematic roles -- 7.1 General s-selection considerations -- 7.2 Lexical selection of compounds -- 7.3 The Unaccusative Alternation -- 7.4 Motivation for chain formation -- 7.5 Causatives and theta roles -- 8. Conclusion -- References. 327 $aArgument prominence and the nature of superiority violations -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Wh patterns in Bangla/Bengali -- 3. What > -- who patterns and Superiority in English -- 3.1 Animacy distinctions among wh-phrases -- 3.2 Thematic relations and empathetic centre of interest -- 3.3 Prosodic factors -- 3.4 Referential familiarity of expected answers to wh-questions -- 4. Bangla sluicing revisited -- 5. The status of Superiority, and argument prominence -- References -- Look across -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Blocking and its discontents -- 3. Sarcastic causatives -- 4. Look across and sarcastic passives -- References -- Author index -- Subject index -- The series Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today. 330 $aThe standard notions of suppletion ansd blocking are tried against the data of Bangla causatives and found wanting. The framework of formalist generative grammar that uses these notions are tried against the surprising data of Bangla sarcastic causatives and found wanting. Remedies are suggested along substantivist lines but in a formalist implementation. Look Across, the new device proposed for this purpose, straddles the syntax-pragmatics boundary. 410 0$aLinguistik aktuell ;$vBd. 108. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xVerb phrase 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xVerb phrase. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax. 676 $a415 701 $aReuland$b Eric J$0173389 701 $aBhattacharya$b Tanmoy$f1962-$0872137 701 $aSpathas$b Giorgos$01800164 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910955858803321 996 $aArgument structure$94344786 997 $aUNINA