LEADER 00729nam0-22002531i-450 001 990002596010403321 005 20240111111501.0 035 $a000259601 035 $aFED01000259601 035 $a(Aleph)000259601FED01 100 $a20000920d1954----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 200 1 $aEnglish accountancy$ea study in social and economic history, 1800-1954$fNicholas A. H. Stacey 210 $aLondra$cGee$d1954 700 1$aStacey,$bNicholas A. H.$0571118 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990002596010403321 952 $aC3-P20-03a-RA$bs.i.$fECA 952 $aC3-P20-03b-RA$bs.i.$fECA 959 $aECA 996 $aEnglish accountancy$91203630 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03709nam 22006974a 450 001 9910955669903321 005 20251116215738.0 010 $a9786611740603 010 $a9781281740601 010 $a1281740608 010 $a9780300127003 010 $a0300127006 024 7 $a10.12987/9780300127003 035 $a(CKB)1000000000471994 035 $a(EBL)3420031 035 $a(OCoLC)923590014 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000116072 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11143674 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000116072 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10026817 035 $a(PQKB)11033100 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000165639 035 $a(DE-B1597)485153 035 $a(OCoLC)1100435858 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780300127003 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3420031 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10170057 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3420031 035 $a(Perlego)1089068 035 $z(OCoLC)1100435858 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000471994 100 $a20020123d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aBush v. Gore $ethe question of legitimacy /$fedited by Bruce Ackerman 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aNew Haven $cYale University Press$dc2002 215 $a1 online resource (255 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780300093797 311 08$a0300093799 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aAn unreasonable reaction to a reasonable decision / Charles Fried -- Not as bad as Plessy. Worse / Jed Rubenfeld -- EroG v. hsuB : through the looking glass / Laurence H. Tribe -- In partial (but not partisan) praise of principle / Guido Calabresi -- The fallibility of reason / Owen Fiss -- Sustaining the premise of legality : learning to live with Bush v. Gore / Robert Post -- Can the rule of law survive Bush v. Gore / Margaret Jane Radin -- A political question / Steven G. Calabresi -- Political questions and the hazards of pragmatism / Jeffrey Rosen -- The conservatism in Bush v. Gore / Mark Tushnet -- Does the constitution enact the republican party platform? : beyond Bush v. Gore / Cass R. Sunstein -- Off balance / Bruce Ackerman -- Legitimacy and the 2000 election / Jack M. Balkin. 330 $aThe Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This vitally important book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments?The contributors-Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenfeld, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet-represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate. This is a must-read book for thoughtful Americans everywhere. 517 3 $aBush versus Gore 606 $aPresidents$zUnited States$xElection$y2000 606 $aContested elections$zFlorida 615 0$aPresidents$xElection 615 0$aContested elections 676 $a342.73/075 701 $aAckerman$b Bruce A$0123194 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910955669903321 996 $aBush v. Gore$94353914 997 $aUNINA