LEADER 03586nam  2200697Ia 450 
001 9910954949503321
005 20251116165602.0
010   $a9786610447282
010   $a9780309181389
010   $a0309181380
010   $a9781280447280
010   $a1280447281
010   $a9780309653947
010   $a0309653940
035   $a(CKB)1000000000245151
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000106474
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11127219
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000106474
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10106872
035   $a(PQKB)10301188
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3378067
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3378067
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10120235
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL44728
035   $a(OCoLC)923275258
035   $a(Perlego)4736706
035   $a(BIP)13173322
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000245151
100   $a20060407d2006      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aAsking the right questions about electronic voting /$fRichard Celeste, Dick Thornburgh, and Herbert Lin, editors ; Committee on a Framework for Understanding Electronic Voting, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academies Press$d2006
215   $axiv, 148 p
300   $a"This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Award Number IIS-0436133.)"--Colophon p.
311 08$a9780309100243 
311 08$a0309100240 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
330   $aMany election officials look to electronic voting systems as a means for improving their ability to more effectively conduct and administer elections. At the same time, many information technologists and activists have raised important concerns regarding the security of such systems. Policy makers are caught in the midst of a controversy with both political and technological overtones. The public debate about electronic voting is characterized by a great deal of emotion and rhetoric. Asking the Right Questions About Electronic Voting describes the important questions and issues that election officials, policy makers, and informed citizens should ask about the use of computers and information technology in the electoral process--focusing the debate on technical and policy issues that need resolving. The report finds that while electronic voting systems have improved, federal and state governments have not made the commitment necessary for e-voting to be widely used in future elections. More funding, research, and public education are required if e-voting is to become viable.
517 3 $aElectronic voting
606   $aElectronic voting$zUnited States
606   $aElections$zUnited States$xData processing
606   $aVoting$xTechnological innovations
615  0$aElectronic voting
615  0$aElections$xData processing.
615  0$aVoting$xTechnological innovations.
701   $aCeleste$b Richard F$01814801
701   $aThornburgh$b Dick$01601402
701   $aLin$b Herbert$01093194
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on a Framework for Understanding Electronic Voting.
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bDivision on Engineering and Physical Sciences.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910954949503321
996   $aAsking the right questions about electronic voting$94368917
997   $aUNINA