LEADER 03979nam  2200613Ia 450 
001 9910953823903321
005 20251116221037.0
010   $a1-61761-665-6
035   $a(CKB)2560000000067931
035   $a(EBL)3017691
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000419940
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12191652
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000419940
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10384299
035   $a(PQKB)11651059
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3017691
035   $a(BIP)33722581
035   $a(BIP)29227514
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000067931
100   $a20100322d2010      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aHow pretrial publicity affects juror decision making and memory /$fChristine L. Ruva
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aNew York $cNova Science Publishers$dc2010
215   $a1 online resource (66 p.)
225 1 $aLaws and legislation
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a1-61668-328-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $a""HOW PRETRIAL PUBLICITY AFFECTS JUROR DECISION MAKING AND MEMORY""; ""HOW PRETRIAL PUBLICITY AFFECTS JUROR DECISION MAKING AND MEMORY ""; ""CONTENTS ""; ""PREFACE""; ""INTRODUCTION ""; ""REVERSE SUGGESTIBILITY PARADIGM  AND SOURCE MEMORY THEORY""; ""VALENCE OF THE PTP  AND SOURCE MEMORY""; ""IMPRESSION FORMATION  AND VALENCE OF THE PTP ""; ""GROUP DECISION MAKING ""; ""Groups Catch Errors ""; ""Groups Balance out Biase""; ""EXPERIMENT 1 ""; ""OVERVIEW OF EXPERIMENT ""; ""HYPOTHESES ""; ""METHOD""; ""Participants ""; ""Design""; ""Stimuli ""; ""Trial ""; ""Pretrial Publicity ""; ""Measures ""
327   $a""Verdicts and Guilt Ratings """"Source Monitoring Test""; ""Credibility and Attorney Ratings ""; ""PROCEDURE ""; ""First Phase ""; ""Second Phase ""; ""RESULTS""; ""Predeliberation Guilt Measures ""; ""Post-Deliberation and Post- Source Memory Guilt Measures""; ""Source Memory Test, Critical Source Errors ""; ""Source Memory Test, Correct Judgments of Trial Items ""; ""Confidence in Source Memory Judgments ""; ""Credibility Measures""; ""Mediation Analyses ""; ""METHOD""; ""Participants ""; ""Design""; ""Procedure""; ""RESULTS ""; ""Guilt Measures ""
327   $a""Source Monitoring Test, Negative  and Positive PTP Errors """"SOURCE MONITORING TEST, CORRECT JUDGMENTS OF TRIAL ITEMS ""; ""Credibility and Attorney Measures ""; ""Mediation Analyses ""; ""CONCLUSION""; ""IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL SYSTEM ""; ""REFERENCES ""; ""APPENDICES ""; ""INDEX ""
330   $aPretrial publicity (PTP) has been found to have a biasing effect on jury decision making. This chapter explores how research and theory in cognitive psychology has been used to examine the mechanisms responsible for PTP's biasing effects on jury decisions. This research can assist the courts in finding effective remedies for PTP bias. This research suggests that jury deliberations can increase (polarize) juror bias and therefore, cannot be counted on to remedy the effect of PTP on jury decision making. This book also reviews research and theory examining whether memory errors (e.g., source misattributions) and biases of individual jurors are likely to be corrected by jury members during deliberations.
410  0$aLaws and legislation series.
606   $aJury$zUnited States$xDecision making
606   $aFree press and fair trial$zUnited States
606   $aJury$zUnited States$xPsychological aspects
615  0$aJury$xDecision making.
615  0$aFree press and fair trial
615  0$aJury$xPsychological aspects.
676   $a347.73/752
676   $a347.73/752
700   $aRuva$b Christine L$01869747
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910953823903321
996   $aHow pretrial publicity affects juror decision making and memory$94477978
997   $aUNINA