LEADER 01922nam  2200481 a 450 
001 9910953591803321
005 20200520144314.0
010 0 $a9780198029311
010 0 $a0198029314
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7033988
035   $a(CKB)24235097400041
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3052251
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3052251
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10211915
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL53038
035   $a(OCoLC)191826643
035   $a(OCoLC)42619596
035   $a(FINmELB)ELB166400
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7033988
035   $a(OCoLC)63294618
035   $a(EXLCZ)9924235097400041
100   $a19990929d2000      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aHume's abject failure $ethe argument against miracles /$fJohn Earman
210   $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2000
215   $axi, 217 p
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 87-94) and index.
327   $apt. 1. Hume on miracles -- pt. 2. The documents.
330   $aThis vital study offers a new interpretation of Hume's famous Of Miracles, which notoriously argues against the possibility of miracles. By situating Hume's popular argument in the context of the eighteenth-century debate on miracles, Earman shows Hume's argument to be largely unoriginal andchiefly without merit where it is original. Yet Earman constructively conceives how progress can be made on the issues that Hume's essay so provocatively posed about the ability of eyewitness testimony to establish the credibility of marvelous and miraculous events.
606   $aMiracles
615  0$aMiracles.
676   $a212
700   $aEarman$b John$052075
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
912   $a9910953591803321
996   $aHume's abject failure$94464643
997   $aUNINA