LEADER 02322nam 2200361z- 450 001 9910949133803321 005 20220124 035 $a(CKB)5400000000042578 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/77845 035 $a(oapen)doab77845 035 $a(EXLCZ)995400000000042578 100 $a20202201d2021 |y 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aDie Ru?cknahme der a?rztlichen Approbation und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Behandlungsvertrag 210 $cUniversita?tsverlag Go?ttingen$d2021 215 $a1 online resource 311 08$a3-86395-520-X 330 $aIt is rare for a physician to be disbarred; it is even rarer for the disbarment to have a retroactive effect back to the time of granting. The prerequisite for this effect is that the license to practice medicine should not have been granted in the first place, either because the requirements for the training of the future physician were not met or because character defects (unworthiness, unreliability) prevented the person concerned from working as a physician. Although practically rare, the revocation of a license to practice medicine is of particular academic interest because it ultimately results in the entire medical activity of the person affected being subsequently deprived of its legal basis. Strictly speaking, in consequence, each medical intervention becomes unlawful, thus (under certain circumstances) constituting a bodily injury under criminal law as well as giving rise to liability for damages under civil law. However, neither the criminal nor the civil law consequences of such retroactivity have yet been examined in a scientifically sound manner, even to a rudimentary degree. The present dissertation is intended to close this gap, at least in the area of civil law. 606 $aLaw$2bicssc 610 $acivil law 610 $acriminal law 610 $aliability 610 $arevocation of a licence 615 7$aLaw 700 $aMüller$b Jann-Heinrich$4auth$01322266 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910949133803321 996 $aDie Rücknahme der ärztlichen Approbation und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Behandlungsvertrag$93034730 997 $aUNINA