LEADER 01895nam  2200349z- 450 
001 9910920933503321
005 20220317
035   $a(CKB)5400000000044969
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/79398
035   $a(oapen)doab79398
035   $a(EXLCZ)995400000000044969
100   $a20202203d2022      |y         0
101 0 $ager
135   $aurmn|---annan
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aDie unzula?ssige Substitution des chefa?rztlichen Behandlers und ihre Auswirkungen
210   $cUniversita?tsverlag Go?ttingen$d2022
215   $a1 online resource
311 08$a3-86395-511-0 
330   $aIt is common practice for patients in a hospital to be treated by the on-duty physician. If patients want to be treated by a certain physician, then they are subject to additional charges. This is referred to as 'chief physician treatment' because it is often chief physicians who are selected to carry out treatment. Commonly, chief physicians are considered to be particularly experienced and competent. But even if a chief physician treatment is contractually agreed with the patient, in many cases it is not the chief physicians who provide the individual treatment services. Sometimes they do not even participate in the treatment at all but nevertheless all the services are billed as chief physician treatment. Whether and the extent to which the law allows this kind of practice, is the subject of this dissertation.
606   $aLaw$2bicssc
610   $abilling
610   $achief physician treatment
610   $ahospital
615  7$aLaw
700   $aWeise$b Claas-Thorge$4auth$01323696
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910920933503321
996   $aDie unzulässige Substitution des chefärztlichen Behandlers und ihre Auswirkungen$93035734
997   $aUNINA