LEADER 02922oam 2200517I 450 001 9910784952103321 005 20230725023625.0 010 $a1-136-97219-6 010 $a1-136-97220-X 010 $a1-282-65639-2 010 $a9786612656392 010 $a0-203-85183-8 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203851838 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC547368 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL547368 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10402228 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL265639 035 $a(OCoLC)646788545 035 $a(OCoLC)650075707 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000029628 100 $a20180706d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 200 10$aEffective practice in spatial planning /$fJanice Morphet 210 1$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (xv, 291 p.) $cill 225 1 $aThe RTPI library series 311 $a0-415-49282-3 311 $a0-415-49281-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. What is Spatial Planning? -- 2. The Local Governance Context of English Spatial Planning -- 3. The English Spatial Planning System -- 4. The Evidence Base of Spatial Planning -- 5. Community Involvement in Spatial Planning -- 6. Making Places - Delivery Through Spatial Planning -- 7. Taking an Integrated Approach to Local Spatial Delivery -- 8. Managing Spatial Planning -- 9. Regional and Sub-regional Spatial Planning -- 10. Spatial Planning in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland -- 11. Spatial Planning in Europe, North America and Australia -- 12. Effective Spatial Planning. 330 $aAfter years of being regarded as a regulatory tool, spatial planning is now a key agent in delivering better places for the future. Dealing with the role of spatial planning in major change such as urban extensions or redevelopment, this book asks how it can deliver at the local level. Setting out the new local governance within which spatial planning now operates and identifying the requirements of successful delivery, this book also provides an introduction to project management approaches to spatial planning. It details what the rules are for spatial planning, the role of evidence and public involvement in delivering the local vision and how this works as part of coherent and consistent sub-regional approach. The conclusion is a forward look at what is likely to follow the effective creation of inspiring and successful places using spatial planning as a key tool. 410 0$aRTPI library series. 606 $aCity planning$zEngland 606 $aRegional planning$zEngland 615 0$aCity planning 615 0$aRegional planning 676 $a307.1/2160942 700 $aMorphet$b Janice.$0275412 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784952103321 996 $aEffective practice in spatial planning$9245415 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03155nam 22004333a 450 001 9910917293803321 005 20250203232753.0 024 8 $ahttps://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_533871 035 $a(CKB)36723323400041 035 $a(ScCtBLL)d9288e20-be44-4dd3-8f39-57b5c7210379 035 $a(OCoLC)1139843836 035 $a(Perlego)2344173 035 $a(oapen)doab32073 035 $a(EXLCZ)9936723323400041 100 $a20250203i20142019 uu 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 02$aA Typology of Marked-S Languages$fCorinna Handschuh$hVolume 1.0 210 $cLanguage Science Press$d2014 210 1$aBerlin :$cLanguage Science Press,$d2014. 215 $a1 online resource (1 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in Diversity Linguistics 311 08$a9783944675190 311 08$a3944675193 330 $aCase-systems all over the world exhibit striking similarities. In most lan- guages intransitive subjects (S) receives less overt marking than one of the two transitive arguments (agent-like A or patient-like P); the other one of these two arguments is usually encoded by the same form as S. In some languages the amount of overt marking is identical between S, A, and P. But hardly ever does the S argument receive more overt marking than A or P. Yet there are some languages that do not follow this general pattern. This book is about those languages that behave differently, the marked-S languages. Marked-S languages are well-known to be found in East Africa, where they occur in two different language families, Afro-Asiatic and Nilo-Sa- haran. They can also be found in North-Western America and the Pacific region. This book is the first investigation of marked S-languages that treats the phenomenon on a global scale. The study examines the functional distribution of the two main case- forms, the form used for S (S-case) and the case-form of the transitive ar- gument which receives less marking (the zero-case). It offers a very fine- grained perspective considering a wide range of constructions. The con- texts in which the case-marking patterns are investigated include nom- inal, existential and locational predication, subjects in special discourse function (e. g. focused constituents), subjects of passives and dependent clauses, as well as the forms used for addressing someone (vocative form) and for using a noun in isolation (citation form). Apart from the functional distribution of case forms, the formal means of marking are also considered. The main focus is on the synchronic de- scription and comparison of marked-S languages, but historical explana- tions for the unusual case-marking pattern are also discussed. 606 $aLanguage Arts & Disciplines / Linguistics$2bisacsh 606 $aLanguage arts 615 7$aLanguage Arts & Disciplines / Linguistics 615 0$aLanguage arts. 700 $aHandschuh$b Corinna$0802841 801 0$bScCtBLL 801 1$bScCtBLL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910917293803321 996 $aTypology of marked-S languages$91804127 997 $aUNINA