LEADER 02168nam  22004453a 450 
001 9910917272103321
005 20250203235915.0
035   $a(CKB)36720125800041
035   $a(ScCtBLL)3a7d4269-c316-4c96-92fd-fa13e2bd2440
035   $a(OCoLC)1166436567
035   $a(oapen)doab36987
035   $a(EXLCZ)9936720125800041
100   $a20250203i20102020  uu 
101 0 $aita
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 03$aIl discorso di Eraclito$fLaura Gianvittorio
210   $aHildesheim$cGeorg Olms Verlag$d2010
210  1$aHildesheim :$cGeorg Olms Verlag,$d2010.
215   $a1 online resource (1 p.)
311 08$a9783487143866 
311 08$a3487143860 
330   $aSince the "scuola urbinate" (e. g. B. Gentili) applied the oral theory to the Greek lyricists, orality is seen to have influenced thought and language not only of rhapsodists, but of archaic authors in general. Against this background, I investigate how the interaction between orality and literacy, which I suggest to call "aurality", influences the semantics and the linguistic reasoning chiefly of Heraclitus among the early presocratic thinkers. On the one hand Heraclitus is an oral "image-thinker" (Havelock) and his prose is poetically constructed; on the other hand only by writing he can figure out the discourse (?????) as a ???????-composed unity, as I mean he does, rather than holistic or as a continuum, what is common in oral societies. Such a ????? is able to serve as a cosmological model, for the physical world consisting of a multiplicity of phenomena closely jointed to each other into an invisible unity.
606   $aLanguage$2bicssc
610   $acosmology
610   $aHeraclitus
610   $alogos
610   $aorality-literacy
610   $apresocratic philosophical language
610   $asemantics
615  7$aLanguage
700   $aGianvittorio-Ungar$b Laura$0474597
801  0$bScCtBLL
801  1$bScCtBLL
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910917272103321
996   $aIl discorso di Eraclito$92837078
997   $aUNINA