LEADER 01910oam  2200433zu 450 
001 9910873510203321
005 20241212220423.0
010   $a9781467323505
010   $a1467323500
035   $a(CKB)3420000000000853
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000775223
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12351577
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000775223
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10734685
035   $a(PQKB)11662158
035   $a(NjHacI)993420000000000853
035   $a(EXLCZ)993420000000000853
100   $a20160829d2012      uy 
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$a2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP)
210 31$a[Place of publication not identified]$cIEEE$d2012
215   $a1 online resource $cillustrations
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 08$a9781467323512 
311 08$a1467323519 
330   $aA reason we may be at a crossroads in process simulation is that our view has been limited. Possibly we aren't simulating all the relevant aspects of importance to enterprises. For example, being overly focused in the weeds of development and not modeling the business or mission value of process options. To make greater impact we should involve other disciplines and considerations in broader, more holistic models. Software is critical and provides the edge for successful products and organizations, so we should take on a commensurate larger perspective and more informed role. This requires a pro-active approach within organizations.
606   $aSystems software$vCongresses
615  0$aSystems software
676   $a005.16
702   $aIEEE Staff
801  0$bPQKB
906   $aPROCEEDING
912   $a9910873510203321
996   $a2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP)$92506460
997   $aUNINA