LEADER 04026nam  22006615  450 
001 9910869174603321
005 20241216121701.0
010   $a9783031615559$b(electronic bk.)
010   $z9783031615542
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-61555-9
035   $a(PPN)282178252
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC31506016
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL31506016
035   $a(CKB)32575379200041
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-61555-9
035   $a(EXLCZ)9932575379200041
100   $a20240627d2024      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aReconsidering Historical Epistemology $eFrench and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science /$fby Matteo Vagelli
205   $a1st ed. 2024.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2024.
215   $a1 online resource (223 pages)
225 1 $aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,$x2215-1958 ;$v61
311 08$aPrint version: Vagelli, Matteo Reconsidering Historical Epistemology Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2024 9783031615542 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. Reassessing the ?Historical Turn? in Philosophy of Science -- 3. Contemporary Historical Epistemologies -- 4. What (Good) is French Historical Epistemology? -- 5. Bachelard?s ?Normative Turn? in Epistemology -- 6. Canguilhem?s Historiography Of The Life Sciences -- 7. Foucault?s Archaeological History -- 8. Hacking?s Styles of Scientific Reasoning -- 9. Styles of Science, Styles of Philosophy.
330   $aThis book explores the key conceptual stakes underpinning historical epistemology. The strong Anglophone interest in historical epistemology, since at least the 1990s, is typically attributed to its simultaneously philosophical and historical synthetic approach to the study of science. Yet this account, considered by critics to be an unreflective assumption, has prevented historical epistemology from developing a clear understanding and definition, especially regarding how precisely historical and philosophical reflections on the sciences should be combined. Thus, this book uniquely analyses how the problems and tensions inherent to the ?contemporary? phase of historical epistemology can be clarified by reference to the ?classical? French phase. The archaeological method of Michel Foucault, which draws on and transforms fundamental insights by Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem, is used to exert an enduring influence on the field?especially through the work of Ian Hacking and his philosophical cum historical analyses of ?styles of scientific reasoning?. Though this book is of great value to academic specialists and graduate students, the fact it addresses questions broad in scope ensures it is also relevant to a range of scholars in many disciplines and will provoke discussion among those interested in foundational issues in history and philosophy of science.
410  0$aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,$x2215-1958 ;$v61
606   $aPhilosophy$xHistory
606   $aScience$xPhilosophy
606   $aKnowledge, Theory of
606   $aTechnology
606   $aHistory
606   $aHistory of Philosophy
606   $aPhilosophy of Science
606   $aEpistemology
606   $aHistory of Technology
615  0$aPhilosophy$xHistory.
615  0$aScience$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aKnowledge, Theory of.
615  0$aTechnology.
615  0$aHistory.
615 14$aHistory of Philosophy.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Science.
615 24$aEpistemology.
615 24$aHistory of Technology.
676   $a121
700   $aVagelli$b Matteo$01319713
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
912   $a9910869174603321
996   $aReconsidering Historical Epistemology$94171741
997   $aUNINA