LEADER 04046nam 22005293 450 001 9910864290103321 005 20230629235236.0 035 $a(CKB)5680000000037813 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7138402 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7138402 035 $a(NjHacI)995680000000037813 035 $a(EXLCZ)995680000000037813 100 $a20221117d2022 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aTechnological Surveillance of Communication in American, German and Chinese Criminal Procedure. 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aBerlin :$cDuncker & Humblot,$d2022. 210 4$d©2022. 215 $a1 online resource (375 pages) 225 1 $aBeiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure 311 $a3-428-18566-8 311 $a3-428-58566-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 357-373) and index. 327 $aPart I: Surveillance of Wire and Oral Communications in the U.S. -- Part II: Technological surveillance in the Federal Republic of Germany -- Part III: Technological investigative measures in the People's Republic of China -- Part IV: Conclusions with horizontal comparison. 330 $aDue to the rise of organized crime and the rapid development of surveillance technologies, such technologies are increasingly used for the purpose of criminal investigation. However, the proliferation of such highly intrusive measures can jeopardize the individual right to privacy and the constitutionally protected secrecy of private telecommunication. It is therefore necessary to devise a legal framework that balances the need for efficient law enforcement with individuals' privacy rights. In this study, the author discusses the laws on covert surveillance as an investigative measure in the criminal process of the United States, Germany, and the P.R. China from theoretical and empirical perspectives. The author then provides a horizontal comparison of the three legal systems, with the aim of identifying solutions that achieve a proper balance between the protection of the right to privacy and the effective combat of crime.Due to the rise of organized crime and the rapid development of surveillance technologies, such technologies are increasingly used for the purpose of criminal investigation. However, the proliferation of such highly intrusive measures can jeopardize the individual right to privacy and the constitutionally protected secrecy of private telecommunication. It is therefore necessary to devise a legal framework that balances the need for efficient law enforcement with individuals' privacy rights. In this study, the author discusses the laws on covert surveillance as an investigative measure in the criminal process of the United States, Germany, and the P.R. China from theoretical and empirical perspectives. The author then provides a horizontal comparison of the three legal systems, with the aim of identifying solutions that achieve a proper balance between the protection of the right to privacy and the effective combat of crime. 410 0$aBeiträge zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht - Studies in International and European Criminal Law and Procedure 606 $aElectronic surveillance$xLaw and legislation 606 $aWiretapping$xLaw and legislation 606 $aEavesdropping$xLaw and legislation 606 $aCriminal law 615 0$aElectronic surveillance$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aWiretapping$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aEavesdropping$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aCriminal law. 676 $a342.730858 700 $aShi$b Jiahui$01742346 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910864290103321 996 $aTechnological Surveillance of Communication in American, German and Chinese Criminal Procedure$94169037 997 $aUNINA