LEADER 01929oam 2200493 450 001 9910705437303321 005 20141121105834.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002451015 035 $a(OCoLC)881444093 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002451015 100 $a20140617d2014 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPartnerships to advance the business of space $ehearing before the Subcommittee on Science and Space of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, May 16, 2013 210 1$aWashington :$cU.S. Government Printing Office,$d2014. 215 $a1 online resource (iii, 45 pages) 225 1 $aS. hrg. ;$v113-277 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed on June 13, 2014). 300 $aPaper version available for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office. 517 $aPartnerships to advance the business of space 606 $aSpace industrialization$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 606 $aPublic-private sector cooperation$zUnited States 606 $aSpace tourism 607 $aOuter space$xCivilian use$xEconomic aspects$zUnited States 607 $aOuter space$xCivilian use$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 607 $aOuter space$xExploration$xEconomic aspects$zUnited States 608 $aLegislative hearings.$2lcgft 615 0$aSpace industrialization$xGovernment policy 615 0$aPublic-private sector cooperation 615 0$aSpace tourism. 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 801 2$bSEN 801 2$bGPO 801 2$bCOO 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910705437303321 996 $aPartnerships to advance the business of space$93474555 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03522nam 2200589 450 001 9910826761803321 005 20230808213202.0 010 $a90-04-31031-2 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004310315 035 $a(CKB)3710000000569757 035 $a(EBL)4355990 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001600909 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16308491 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001600909 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14837550 035 $a(PQKB)10924313 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16222638 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14837566 035 $a(PQKB)22902002 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4355990 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004310315 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000569757 100 $a20160213h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDivine causality and human free choice $eDomingo Ba?n?ez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited /$fRobert Joseph Matava 210 1$aLeiden, Netherlands ;$aBoston, Massachusetts :$cBrill,$d2016. 210 4$d©2016 215 $a1 online resource (377 p.) 225 1 $aBrill's Studies in Intellectual History,$x0920-8607 ;$vVolume 252 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-31030-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tPreliminary Material /$rR.J. Matava -- $tPrologue /$rR.J. Matava -- $t1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis /$rR.J. Matava -- $t2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice /$rR.J. Matava -- $t3 Domingo Báñez?s Critique of Molina /$rR.J. Matava -- $t4 Luis de Molina?s Critique of Báñez /$rR.J. Matava -- $t5 Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan /$rR.J. Matava -- $t6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas /$rR.J. Matava -- $t7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense /$rR.J. Matava -- $tEpilogue /$rR.J. Matava -- $tSelect Bibliography /$rR.J. Matava -- $tIndex /$rR.J. Matava. 330 $aIn Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez?s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas. 410 0$aBrill's studies in intellectual history ;$vVolume 252. 606 $aFree will and determinism$xReligious aspects$xCatholic Church 606 $aMolinism 615 0$aFree will and determinism$xReligious aspects$xCatholic Church. 615 0$aMolinism. 676 $a233/.7 700 $aMatava$b Robert Joseph$01656387 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826761803321 996 $aDivine causality and human free choice$94009238 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04584nam 22006735 450 001 9910863299403321 005 20220502080025.0 010 $a9789811575013 010 $a9811575010 024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-15-7501-3 035 $a(CKB)4100000011477051 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6360758 035 $a(DE-He213)978-981-15-7501-3 035 $a(PPN)25946435X 035 $a(Perlego)3481980 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011477051 100 $a20200928d2021 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSecession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm $eImplications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /$fby Kenneth E. Bauzon 205 $a1st ed. 2021. 210 1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Nature Singapore :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2021. 215 $a1 online resource (XVIII, 137 p. 1 illus.) 225 1 $aPalgrave pivot 311 08$a9789811575006 311 08$a9811575002 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Formal-Legalist Explanation -- 3. Critique of Formal-Legalism -- 4. The Return of Historical Materialism -- 5. Epilogue. 330 $aThis book explores how formal-legalism, as the dominant paradigm of explanation, has sought to explain the phenomenon of secessionism among its practitioners as a problem for the modern state. This study bears how these practitioners have, over time, described, defined, and proposed to solve secessionism and related political problems within the logic of their paradigm. In the process, the book reconstructs the formalist worldview and the practitioners' fundamental presuppositions which, to them, render comprehensible and meaningful the occurrence of events, like secession, as well as means of dealing with it. More significantly, the book exposes a debilitating flaw of formal-legalist paradigm as it fails to account for other principles of mobilization in political and social life that defy formal-legal rules such as those based on race, ethnicity, language, culture, and material factors. Narrow adherence to textual sources and the literal approach, have led formal-legalists to miss, willfully ignore, or endorse the paradigm's strategic association with state power, evolving since the dawn of the Enlightenment. Formal-legalism has lent itself amenable to the interests of the state and to the variable construction of the meaning of the law devoid of original spirit and universality but conforming with the specific interests of the state or, for that matter, the prevailing American empire, both spatially and temporally. Accounting for this anomaly, the historical materialist perspective is considered, with appropriate historical and contemporary illustrations, as a relevant explanatory alternative to the now-obsolescent formal-legalist paradigm. With the assumption that, indeed, economic and material considerations such as those demanded by the dominant class elements within the state underlie the rationale for the state, formal-legalism has evolved from one that initially provided a presumed objective view of society to one that has subjectively become an essential part of the cultural suprastructure that allows these elements to command the state as a principal tool for labor- and value-extraction during what is popularly known as contemporary neoliberal globalization. Kenneth E. Bauzon, with a doctorate in Political Science from Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina, is currently Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's College in New York, USA. . 410 0$aPalgrave pivot. 606 $aPolitical science 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aPostcolonialism 606 $aPolitical sociology 606 $aEconomic development 606 $aPolitical Theory 606 $aPostcolonial Philosophy 606 $aPolitical Sociology 606 $aDevelopment Studies 615 0$aPolitical science. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aPostcolonialism. 615 0$aPolitical sociology. 615 0$aEconomic development. 615 14$aPolitical Theory. 615 24$aPostcolonial Philosophy. 615 24$aPolitical Sociology. 615 24$aDevelopment Studies. 676 $a320.015 700 $aBauzon$b Kenneth E.$0856504 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910863299403321 996 $aSecession in the formal-legalist paradigm$92845910 997 $aUNINA