LEADER 03930oam 22004934a 450 001 9910861069603321 005 20180817104805.0 010 $a0-7006-2333-7 035 $a(CKB)3810000000068504 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5244903 035 $a(OCoLC)966771393 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse53010 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC31275068 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL31275068 035 $a(EXLCZ)993810000000068504 100 $a20050916d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aAntonin Scalia's Jurisprudence $eText and Tradition /$fRalph A. Rossum 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aLawrence, Kansas :$cUniversity Press of Kansas,$d[2006] 210 4$dİ2006 215 $a1 online resource (367 pages) 311 $a0-7006-2350-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 213-279) and index. 327 $a"Text and tradition" : Scalia's understanding of the interpretative enterprise -- Constitutional structure and separation of powers -- Constitutional structure and federalism -- Scalia's textualism applied to substantive rights -- Scalia's textualism applied to procedural rights -- The impact of Scalia's textualism on his colleagues -- Appendix. Cases in which Justice Scalia has cited dictionaries. 330 $a" Lionized by the right and demonized by the left, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is the high court's quintessential conservative. Witty, outspoken, often abrasive, he is widely regarded as the most controversial member of the Court. This book is the first comprehensive, reasoned, and sympathetic analysis of how Scalia has decided cases during his entire twenty-year Supreme Court tenure. Ralph Rossum focuses on Scalia's more than 600 Supreme Court opinions and dissents--carefully wrought, passionately argued, and filled with well-turned phrases--which portray him as an eloquent defender of an "original meaning" jurisprudence. He also includes analyses of Scalia's Court of Appeals opinions for the D.C. circuit, his major law review articles as a law professor and judge, and his provocative book, A Matter of Interpretation. Rossum reveals Scalia's understanding of key issues confronting today's Court, such as the separation of powers, federalism, the free speech and press and religion clauses of the First Amendment, and the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. He suggests that Scalia displays such a keen interest in defending federalism that he sometimes departs from text and tradition, and reveals that he has disagreed with other justices most often in decisions involving the meaning of the First Amendment's establishment clause. He also analyzes Scalia's positions on the commerce clause and habeas corpus clause of Article I, the take care clause of Article II, the criminal procedural provisions of Amendments Four through Eight, protection of state sovereign immunity in the Eleventh Amendment, and Congress's enforcement power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The first book to fully articulate the contours of Scalia's constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence, Rossum's insightful study ultimately depicts Scalia as a principled, consistent, and intelligent textualist who is fearless and resolute, notwithstanding the controversy he often inspires. "--$cProvided by publisher. 606 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States 606 $aConstitutional history$zUnited States 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aConstitutional law 615 0$aConstitutional history 676 $a347.73/2634 686 $aLAW060000$aPOL022000$aLAW018000$2bisacsh 700 $aRossum$b Ralph A.$f1946-$01171317 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910861069603321 996 $aAntonin Scalia's Jurisprudence$94167157 997 $aUNINA