LEADER 03914nam 22006375 450 001 9910861028903321 005 20230124193348.0 010 $a0-226-29370-X 024 7 $a10.7208/9780226293707 035 $a(CKB)3710000000485441 035 $a(EBL)4312092 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001554717 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16179670 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001554717 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)13104314 035 $a(PQKB)10975738 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001379763 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4312092 035 $a(DE-B1597)524342 035 $a(OCoLC)923253772 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780226293707 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000485441 100 $a20200424h20152015 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aArticulating the World $eConceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image /$fJoseph Rouse 210 1$aChicago : $cUniversity of Chicago Press, $d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (430 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-226-29384-X 311 $a0-226-29367-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $t1. Naturalism and the Scientific Image -- $t2. What Is Conceptual Understanding? -- $t3. Conceptual Understanding in Light of Evolution -- $t4. Language, Social Practice, and Conceptual Normativity -- $t5. Two Concepts of Objectivity -- $t6. Scientific Practice and the Scientific Image -- $t7. Experimental Practice and Conceptual Understanding -- $t8. Laws and Modalities in Scientific Practice -- $t9. Laboratory Fictions and the Opening of Scientific Domains -- $t10. Scientific Significance -- $t11. Naturalism Articulated -- $tEpilogue: Naturalism and the Contingency of the Space of Reasons -- $tReferences -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIndex 330 $aNaturalism as a guiding philosophy for modern science both disavows any appeal to the supernatural or anything else transcendent to nature, and repudiates any philosophical or religious authority over the workings and conclusions of the sciences. A longstanding paradox within naturalism, however, has been the status of scientific knowledge itself, which seems, at first glance, to be something that transcends and is therefore impossible to conceptualize within scientific naturalism itself. In Articulating the World, Joseph Rouse argues that the most pressing challenge for advocates of naturalism today is precisely this: to understand how to make sense of a scientific conception of nature as itself part of nature, scientifically understood. Drawing upon recent developments in evolutionary biology and the philosophy of science, Rouse defends naturalism in response to this challenge by revising both how we understand our scientific conception of the world and how we situate ourselves within it. 606 $aComprehension (Theory of knowledge) 606 $aNaturalism 606 $aConcepts 606 $aScience$xPhilosophy 610 $ascience, scientific, scientist, conceptual, concepts, understanding, philosophy, philosopher, philosophical, naturalist, naturalism, modern, contemporary, supernatural, transcendental, transcendent, nature, religious, faith, belief, paradox, knowledge, self, evolution, evolutionary, biology, biologist, interdisciplinary, theory, theoretical, academic, scholarly, research. 615 0$aComprehension (Theory of knowledge) 615 0$aNaturalism. 615 0$aConcepts. 615 0$aScience$xPhilosophy. 676 $a501.9 686 $aAK 20000$2rvk 700 $aRouse$b Joseph, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01741686 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910861028903321 996 $aArticulating the World$94167823 997 $aUNINA