LEADER 05177nam 22006014a 450 001 9910841409803321 005 20230617031212.0 010 $a1-280-36773-3 010 $a9786610367733 010 $a0-470-23915-8 010 $a0-471-46572-0 010 $a0-471-72202-2 035 $a(CKB)1000000000019080 035 $a(EBL)175909 035 $a(OCoLC)223835105 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000148366 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11149320 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000148366 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10224332 035 $a(PQKB)10243706 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC175909 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000019080 100 $a20030212d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEnvironmental impact assessment$b[electronic resource] $epractical solutions to recurrent problems /$fDavid P. Lawrence 210 $aHoboken, N.J. $cWiley-Interscience$dc2003 215 $a1 online resource (578 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-471-45722-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 517-547) and index. 327 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CONTENTS; PREFACE; 1 INTRODUCTION; 1.1 Highlights; 1.2 A Not-So-Hypothetical Scenario; 1.3 First Principles; 1.4 The Basics; 1.5 The Baseline; 1.6 A Structure; 1.7 A Strategy; 1.8 A Road Map; 1.9 Summing Up; 2 CONVENTIONAL EIA PROCESSES; 2.1 Highlights; 2.2 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 2.3 Conventional Regulatory EIA Approaches; 2.4 Conventional Applied Processes; 2.5 Summing Up; 3 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE RIGOROUS; 3.1 Highlights; 3.2 Insights from Practice; 3.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction 327 $a3.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route3.5 Instituting a Scientific EIA Process; 3.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 3.7 Summing Up; 4 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE RATIONAL; 4.1 Highlights; 4.2 Insights from Practice; 4.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 4.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 4.5 Instituting a Rational EIA Process; 4.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 4.7 Summing Up; 5 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE SUBSTANTIVE; 5.1 Highlights; 5.2 Insights from Practice; 5.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 5.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route 327 $a5.5 Instituting a Substantive EIA Process5.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 5.7 Summing Up; 6 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE PRACTICAL; 6.1 Highlights; 6.2 Insights from Practice; 6.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 6.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 6.5 Instituting a Practical EIA Process; 6.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 6.7 Summing Up; 7 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE DEMOCRATIC; 7.1 Highlights; 7.2 Insights from Practice; 7.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 7.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 7.5 Instituting a Democratic EIA Process 327 $a7.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness7.7 Summing Up; 8 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE COLLABORATIVE; 8.1 Highlights; 8.2 Insights from Practice; 8.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 8.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 8.5 Instituting a Collaborative EIA Process; 8.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 8.7 Summing Up; 9 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE ETHICAL; 9.1 Highlights; 9.2 Insights from Practice; 9.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 9.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 9.5 Instituting an Ethical EIA Process; 9.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 9.7 Summing Up 327 $a10 HOW TO MAKE EIAs MORE ADAPTIVE10.1 Highlights; 10.2 Insights from Practice; 10.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 10.4 Selecting the Most Appropriate Route; 10.5 Instituting an Adaptive EIA Process; 10.6 Assessing Process Effectiveness; 10.7 Summing Up; 11 HOW TO CONNECT AND COMBINE EIA PROCESSES; 11.1 Highlights; 11.2 Insights from Practice; 11.3 Defining the Problem and Deciding on a Direction; 11.4 Composite Regulatory Frameworks; 11.5 Matching Process and Context; 11.6 Process Interconnections; 11.7 Composite EIA Processes; 11.8 Challenges and Priorities 327 $a11.9 Scenario Postscript 330 $aThis book challenges the prevailing assumption that Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should be structured around a unitary EIA process. The book begins by identifying, through a scenario, eight recurrent problems in EIA practice. The characteristics of multiple variations of conventional EIA processes, at both the regulatory and applied levels, are then presented. The residual problems that remain after the conventional processes are described and assessed providing the springboard for a description and analysis of eight alternative EIA processes. 606 $aEnvironmental impact analysis 615 0$aEnvironmental impact analysis. 676 $a301.31 676 $a333.714 700 $aLawrence$b David P$g(David Phillip),$f1947-$01643843 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910841409803321 996 $aEnvironmental impact assessment$94140771 997 $aUNINA