LEADER 03661nam  2200733 a 450 
001 9910829088403321
005 20240513033115.0
010   $a1-282-88505-7
010   $a9786612885051
010   $a3-11-023440-8
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110234404
035   $a(CKB)2670000000055397
035   $a(EBL)605980
035   $a(OCoLC)689997553
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000413605
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12190919
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000413605
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10383761
035   $a(PQKB)11500988
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC605980
035   $a(DE-B1597)113884
035   $a(OCoLC)1002243494
035   $a(OCoLC)1004878478
035   $a(OCoLC)1011446905
035   $a(OCoLC)690115475
035   $a(OCoLC)987936827
035   $a(OCoLC)992544555
035   $a(OCoLC)999354866
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110234404
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL605980
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10424422
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL288505
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000055397
100   $a20101119d2010      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aCase and agreement from fringe to core $ea minimalist approach /$fStefan Keine
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aBerlin $cDe Gruyter$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (240 p.)
225 1 $aLinguistische Arbeiten,$x0344-6727 ;$v536
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-11-023439-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $t Frontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $tAbbreviations -- $t1. Introduction -- $t2. Theoretical Background -- $t3. The Input to Agree -- $t4. Eccentric Agreement -- $t5. Icelandic Nominative Objects -- $t6. Global Case Splits -- $t7. ?-Impoverishment -- $t8. Concluding Remarks -- $t Backmatter
330   $aThis book explores the view that impoverishment and Agree operations are part of a single grammatical component. The architecture set forth here gives rise tocomplex but highly systematic interactions between the two operations. This interaction is shown to provide a unified and general account of apparentlydiverse and unrelated intances of eccentric argument encoding that so far haveremained elusive to a unified theoretical account. The proposed view of the grammatical architecture achieves an integration of these phenomena withinbetter-studied languages and thus gives rise to a more general theory of caseand agreement phenomena. The empirical evidence on the basis of which the proposal is developed drawsfrom a wide range of typologically non-related languages, including Basque, Hindi, Icelandic, Itelmen, Marathi, Nez Perce, Niuean, Punjabi, Sahaptin, Selayarese, Yukaghir, and Yurok . The proposal has far-reaching consequences for the study of grammatical architecture, linguistic interfaces, derivational locality in apparently non-local dependencies and the role of functional considerations in formal approaches tothe human language faculty. 
410  0$aLinguistische Arbeiten (Max Niemeyer Verlag) ;$v536.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xCase
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xAgreement
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xCase.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xAgreement.
676   $a415
686   $aET 660$2rvk
700   $aKeine$b Stefan$01604687
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910829088403321
996   $aCase and agreement from fringe to core$93929635
997   $aUNINA