LEADER 03713nam 2200673 a 450 001 9910828490603321 005 20240516084841.0 010 $a1-283-39959-8 010 $a9786613399595 010 $a3-11-023903-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110239034 035 $a(CKB)2550000000041646 035 $a(EBL)736996 035 $a(OCoLC)819639197 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000530908 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11317189 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000530908 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10569194 035 $a(PQKB)10910344 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC736996 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00008541 035 $a(DE-B1597)122861 035 $a(OCoLC)979745071 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110239034 035 $a(PPN)175498172 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000041646 100 $a20101217d2011 uy 0 101 0 $alat 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aAnonymus londiniensis $ede medicina /$fedidit Daniela Manetti 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aBerlin ;$aNew York $cDe Gruyter$dc2011 215 $a1 online resource (160 p.) 225 1 $aBibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana,$x1864-399X 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-021871-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tHOC VOLVMINE CONTINENTVR --$tPRAEFATIO --$tDE HVIVS EDITIONIS RATIONE --$tCONSPECTVS EDITIONVM --$tCONSPECTVS LIBRORVM --$tCONSPECTVS SIGLORVM --$tAnonymi Londiniensis Iatrica --$tFragmenta maiora --$tFragmenta incertae sedis apud D. --$tIndex verborum et nominum 330 $aGreat change has pervaded the evaluation of this text, since it was first published by Diels in 1893: it appeared to be a text consisting of notes on an introductory course of medicine, badly copied by a scribe or an uneducated pupil, probably written in the age of Domitian or Trajan. Its most disturbing aspect was the presence of a doxography on the causes of disease, attributed to Aristotle, recording numerous doxai of 5th and 4th century physicians and philosophers, including Hippocrates, who constituted the crux of the controversy, because the figure ill accorded with the image that had taken shape in nineteenth-century historiography. In recent years new insights have shown that actually it is an autograph, an unfinished draft, that the author, to be dated to 1st cent. AD, excerpted earlier derivative literature but has also views of his own, that the doxography derived from 'Aristotle' is to be clearly placed in the early Peripatetic setting, that the physiological section, which follows, has a background of school practice in dialectical argument, that the main authorities "ed in the text (Herophilus, Erasistratus and Asclepiades) have different roles (Herophilus's is the most positive) but the authors always feels at liberty to confute their opinions and treats them as characters of the same scientific context. 410 0$aBibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. 606 $aMedicine, Greek and Roman$vEarly works to 1800 606 $aMedicine$xPhilosophy$vEarly works to 1800 610 $aPapyrology, Ancient Science and Medicine, Ancient philosophy, Greek texts. 615 0$aMedicine, Greek and Roman 615 0$aMedicine$xPhilosophy 676 $a610.938 686 $aFH 75800$2rvk 700 $aAnonymus ?Londiniensis?$0476538 701 $aManetti$b Daniela$0169460 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828490603321 996 $aAnonymus londiniensis$94047386 997 $aUNINA