LEADER 02420nam 2200577 450 001 9910828459003321 005 20230803205515.0 010 $a1-59332-790-0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000259935 035 $a(EBL)1812568 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001350018 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12491110 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001350018 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11287570 035 $a(PQKB)11719626 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1812568 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1812568 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10951597 035 $a(OCoLC)893332694 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000259935 100 $a20141018h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aGender-responsive risk assessment in corrections /$fValerie R. Bell 210 1$aEl Paso, Texas :$cLFB Scholarly Publishing LLC,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (219 p.) 225 1 $aCriminal Justice : Recent Scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-763-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aRisk assessment in corrections allows practitioners to not only predict the likelihood of success for an offender and to identify areas to target for reduced risk. Such targets are argued to be different for men and women (Bloom, Owen & Covington, 2003). Bell examines the predictive validity of the Women's Risk/Needs Assessment on a sample of women and a sample of men. Results indicate that there are differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and predictive validity of risk/needs and strengths for men and women. Results support prior studies regarding gender-neutral risk assessment for male 410 0$aCriminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) 606 $aFemale offenders$xRehabilitation$zUnited States 606 $aCommunity-based corrections$zUnited States 606 $aRecidivism$zUnited States 615 0$aFemale offenders$xRehabilitation 615 0$aCommunity-based corrections 615 0$aRecidivism 676 $a365/.60810973 700 $aBell$b Valerie$g(Valerie R.),$01649581 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828459003321 996 $aGender-responsive risk assessment in corrections$93998394 997 $aUNINA