LEADER 03338nam  2200661   450 
001 9910828356303321
005 20230914175204.0
010   $a90-04-18328-0
024 7 $a10.1163/9789004183285
035   $a(CKB)2550000001170383
035   $a(EBL)1582249
035   $a(OCoLC)865650759
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001080504
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11667816
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001080504
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11069886
035   $a(PQKB)10103373
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1582249
035   $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004183285
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1582249
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10820825
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL552270
035   $a(PPN)178914525
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001170383
100   $a20131230h20142014  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe genitive case in Dutch and German $ea study of morphosyntactic change in codified languages /$fAlan K. Scott
210  1$aLeiden :$cBrill,$d[2014]
210  4$dİ2014
215   $a1 online resource (xi, 383 pages)
225 0 $aBrill's studies in historical linguistics,$x2211-4904 ;$vvolume 2
311 0 $a90-04-18144-X 
311 0 $a1-306-21019-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFront Matter /$rAlan K. Scott --$tIntroduction /$rAlan K. Scott --$tMorphosyntactic Change /$rAlan K. Scott --$tThe Genitive Case /$rAlan K. Scott --$tData and Methodology /$rAlan K. Scott --$tThe Dutch Genitive /$rAlan K. Scott --$tThe German Genitive /$rAlan K. Scott --$tCodification and Morphosyntactic Change /$rAlan K. Scott --$tConclusions and Closing Remarks /$rAlan K. Scott --$tAppendix 1: Primary Sources /$rAlan K. Scott --$tReferences /$rAlan K. Scott --$tIndex /$rAlan K. Scott.
330   $aIn The Genitive Case in Dutch and German: A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages , Alan K. Scott offers an account of the tension that exists between morphosyntactic change and codification, focusing on the effect that codification has had on the genitive case and alternative constructions in both languages. On the basis of usage data from a wide variety of registers, from the 16th century to the present day, Alan K. Scott demonstrates that codification has preserved obsolescent morphological genitive constructions in Dutch and German while suppressing their potential replacements, and shows that, despite its association with norm-conformant language, the genitive is used to a surprisingly large extent in informal early modern Dutch and modern German sources.
410  0$aBrill's Studies in Historical Linguistics$v2.
606   $aDutch language$xCase
606   $aGerman language$xCase
606   $aDutch language$xMorphosyntax
606   $aGerman language$xMorphosyntax
615  0$aDutch language$xCase.
615  0$aGerman language$xCase.
615  0$aDutch language$xMorphosyntax.
615  0$aGerman language$xMorphosyntax.
676   $a410.384
700   $aScott$b Alan$g(Alan K.)$0149743
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910828356303321
996   $aThe genitive case in Dutch and German$93962323
997   $aUNINA