LEADER 04148nam 2200685Ia 450 001 9910828353203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8147-5941-6 024 7 $a10.18574/9780814759417 035 $a(CKB)2670000000276391 035 $a(EBL)1057777 035 $a(OCoLC)819624132 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000832307 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12336833 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000832307 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10899454 035 $a(PQKB)11346432 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001326820 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1057777 035 $a(OCoLC)818819038 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse19236 035 $a(DE-B1597)547997 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780814759417 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000276391 100 $a20120618d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#---|un|u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aJudging addicts $edrug courts and coercion in the justice system /$fRebecca Tiger 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aNew York $cNew York University Press$dc2013 215 $a1 online resource (209 p.) 225 0$aAlternative criminology series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a0-8147-8407-0 311 0 $a0-8147-8406-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction --$t1. Both Bad and Sick --$t2. Criminalizing Deviance --$t3. ?The Right Thing to Do for the Right Reasons? --$t4. ?Enlightened Coercion? --$t5. ?Force Is the Best Medicine? --$t6. ?Now That We Know the Medicine Works? --$tConclusion --$tAppendix --$tNotes --$tBibliography --$tIndex --$tAbout the Author 330 $aThe number of people incarcerated in the U.S. now exceeds 2.3 million, due in part to the increasing criminalization of drug use: over 25% of people incarcerated in jails and prisons are there for drug offenses. Judging Addicts examines this increased criminalization of drugs and the medicalization of addiction in the U.S. by focusing on drug courts, where defendants are sent to drug treatment instead of prison. Rebecca Tiger explores how advocates of these courts make their case for what they call ?enlightened coercion,? detailing how they use medical theories of addiction to justify increased criminal justice oversight of defendants who, through this process, are defined as both ?sick? and ?bad. ?Tiger shows how these courts fuse punitive and therapeutic approaches to drug use in the name of a ?progressive? and ?enlightened? approach to addiction. She critiques the medicalization of drug users, showing how the disease designation can complement, rather than contradict, punitive approaches, demonstrating that these courts are neither unprecedented nor unique, and that they contain great potential to expand punitive control over drug users. Tiger argues that the medicalization of addiction has done little to stem the punishment of drug users because of a key conceptual overlap in the medical and punitive approaches?that habitual drug use is a problem that needs to be fixed through sobriety. Judging Addicts presses policymakers to implement humane responses to persistent substance use that remove its control entirely from the criminal justice system and ultimately explores the nature of crime and punishment in the U.S. today. 410 0$aAlternative criminology series. 606 $aDrug courts$zUnited States 606 $aDuress (Law)$zUnited States 606 $aDrug abuse$xTreatment$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aDrug addicts$xLegal status, laws, etc$zUnited States 615 0$aDrug courts 615 0$aDuress (Law) 615 0$aDrug abuse$xTreatment$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aDrug addicts$xLegal status, laws, etc. 676 $a345.7302770269 686 $aMS 6410$2rvk 700 $aTiger$b Rebecca$01626342 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828353203321 996 $aJudging Addicts$93962296 997 $aUNINA