LEADER 03480nam  2200841   450 
001 9910828310603321
005 20230120043649.0
010   $a0-8232-6269-3
010   $a0-8232-6637-0
010   $a0-8232-6271-5
010   $a0-8232-6272-3
024 7 $a10.1515/9780823262717
035   $a(CKB)3710000000224272
035   $a(EBL)3239925
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001292765
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11742782
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001292765
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11284765
035   $a(PQKB)11206391
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001111261
035   $a(OCoLC)889644693
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse37918
035   $a(DE-B1597)555399
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780823262717
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3239925
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10913497
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL671359
035   $a(OCoLC)1040682913
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1884028
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3239925
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5046443
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1884028
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000224272
100   $a20140909h20152015  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|nu---|u||u
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe reject $ecommunity, politics, and religion after the subject /$fIrving Goh
205   $aFirst edition.
210  1$aNew York, New York :$cFordham University Press,$d2015.
210  4$dİ2015
215   $a1 online resource (381 p.)
225 1 $aCommonalities
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-322-40077-6 
311   $a0-8232-6268-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFront matter --$tContents --$tPreface: A Book For Everyone --$tAcknowledgments --$t1. Introduction --$t2. (After) Friendship, Love, and Community --$t3. The Reject And The ?Postsecular,? or Who?s Afraid of Religion --$t4. Prolegomenon to Reject Politics --$t5. Clinamen, or the Auto-Reject for ?Posthuman? Futures. --$t6. Conclusion --$tNotes --$tWorks Cited --$tIndex --$tCommonalities
330   $aThis book proposes a theory of the reject, a more adequate figure than the subject for thinking friendship, love, community, democracy, the postsecular, and the posthuman. Through close readings of Nancy, Deleuze, Derrida, Cixous, Clement, Bataille, Balibar, Ranciere, and Badiou, Goh shows how the reject has always been nascent in contemporary French thought. The recent turn to animals and bare life, as well as the rise of the Occupy movement, he argues, presents a special urgency to think the reject today. Thinking the reject most importantly helps to advance our commitment to affirm others without acculturating their differences. But the reject also offers, Goh proposes, a response finally commensurate with the radical horizon of Nancy?s question of who comes after the subject.
410  0$aCommonalities.
606   $aRejection (Psychology)
606   $aOutcasts
610   $aCixous.
610   $aDerrida.
610   $aIncompossible.
610   $aNancy.
610   $aPost-Secular.
610   $aPosthuman.
610   $aReject.
610   $aSubject.
615  0$aRejection (Psychology)
615  0$aOutcasts.
676   $a126
700   $aGoh$b Irving$01710287
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910828310603321
996   $aThe reject$94100770
997   $aUNINA