LEADER 05696nam 2200721 450 001 9910828295903321 005 20230803021657.0 010 $a90-272-7168-2 035 $a(CKB)2550000001117337 035 $a(EBL)1394969 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001000091 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11541167 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001000091 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10943539 035 $a(PQKB)10224503 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1394969 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1394969 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10767250 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL517775 035 $a(OCoLC)858654030 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001117337 100 $a20130513h20132013 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe ethics of literary communication $egenuineness, directness, indirectness /$fedited by Roger D. Sell, Adam Borch, Inna Lindgren, A?bo Akademi University 210 1$aAmsterdam :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2013] 210 4$dİ2013 215 $a1 online resource (283 p.) 225 1 $aDialogue studies ;$vvolume 19 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-1036-5 311 $a1-299-86524-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe Ethics of Literary Communication; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; Contributors; 1. Introduction; 1. Interdisciplinary aims; 2. Literature and communicational ethics; 3. Main findings; 4. In conclusion; References; 2. Herbert's considerateness: A communicational assessment; References; 3. "Not my readers but the readers of their own selves": Literature as communication with the self i; 1. The Narrator's stated aim; 2. 'Literature', 'self', 'message'; 3. "It seemed to me that I myself was what the book was talking about" 327 $aReferences4. Intersubjective positioning and community-making: E. E. Cummings's Preface to his Collected Poems; 1. Targeting and creating a literary audience; 2. Theoretical background; 3. Courtship; 4. Commandeering; 5. Real readers and dialogical response; References; 5. Genuine and distorted communication in autobiographical writing: E. M. Forster's "West Hackhurst"; 1. An undervalued text?; 2. Genesis, structure and first impressions; 3. The Memoir Club as a literary site; 4. Literary artistry in autobiographical writing; 5. An honest portrait of communicational failure 327 $a6. Conclusion: Bigger than it seemsReferences; 6. Women and the public sphere: Pope's addressivity through The Dunciad; 1. Introduction; 2. A personal address and its consequences; 3. Comparing notes about communication; 4. Impolite genuineness; References; 7. Kipling, his narrator, and public interest; 1. The narrator in the stories; 2. Kipling in the autobiography; 3. A community founded on public interest; References; 8. Call and response: Autonomy and dialogicity in Isaac Bashevis Singer's The Penitent; 1. The narrative framework and communicational ethics; 2. Religion and literature 327 $a3. From Socrates to AristotleReferences; 9. Hypothetical action: Poetry under erasure in Blake, Dickinson and Eliot; 1. Introduction; 2. Blake's "The Tyger": The act of creation questioned; 3. Meeting apart in Emily Dickinson's "I cannot live with You"; 4. Prufrock's imaginary walk: Recurrent and local techniques; 5. Conclusion; References; Appendix 1; Appendix 2; 10. Metacommunication as ritual: Contemporary Romanian poetry; 1. Introduction; 2. A framework for poetic (meta)communication; 3. Communicational pathology and cultural resistance; 4. Literary resistance 327 $a5. Patterns of response to totalitarian discourse6. Conclusions; References; Appendix; 11. Terminal aposiopesis and sublime communication: Shakespeare's Sonnet 126 and Keats's "To Autumn"; 1. "The vice of writing"; 2. Terminal aposiopesis and its triple challenge; 3. Two cases in point; 4. Absolute sublimity and contextless communication; References; 12. The utopian horizon of communication: Ernst Bloch's Traces and Johann-Peter Hebel's Treasure Che; 1. Introduction; 2. Literature as communication; 3. Bloch: Traces of the ultimate; 4. The "we-problem" 327 $a5. Johann-Peter Hebel: The calendar story as a place of openness 330 $aViewing literature as one among other forms of communication, Roger D. Sell and his colleagues evaluate writer-respondent relationships according to the same ethical criterion as applies for dialogue of any other kind. In a nutshell: Are writers and readers respecting each other's human autonomy? If and when the answer here is "Yes!", Sell's team describe the communication that is going on as 'genuine'. In this latest book, they offer new illustrations of what they mean by this, and ask whether genuineness is compatible with communicational directness and communicational indirectness. Is there 410 0$aDialogue studies ;$vv. 19. 606 $aDiscourse analysis, Literary 606 $aCommunication in literature 606 $aLanguage and ethics 606 $aLiterature$xPhilosophy 615 0$aDiscourse analysis, Literary. 615 0$aCommunication in literature. 615 0$aLanguage and ethics. 615 0$aLiterature$xPhilosophy. 676 $a808.001/4 701 $aSell$b Roger D$0454878 701 $aBorch$b Adam$01678621 701 $aLindgren$b Inna$01678622 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828295903321 996 $aThe ethics of literary communication$94046413 997 $aUNINA