LEADER 03265nam  2200697Ia 450 
001 9910828058703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-107-14828-6
010   $a1-280-43727-8
010   $a0-511-18430-1
010   $a0-511-16600-1
010   $a0-511-16405-X
010   $a0-511-31288-1
010   $a0-511-61638-4
010   $a0-511-16485-8
035   $a(CKB)1000000000353252
035   $a(EBL)255206
035   $a(OCoLC)437163527
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000254919
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11188639
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000254919
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10211389
035   $a(PQKB)11437718
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511616389
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL255206
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10120487
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL43727
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC255206
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000353252
100   $a20030317d2004      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 12$aA systematic theory of argumentation $ethe pragma-dialectical approach /$fFrans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d2004
215   $a1 online resource (vii, 216 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-53772-X 
311   $a0-521-83075-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 197-206) and index.
327   $aCover; Half-title; Dedication; Title; Copyright; Contents; Preface; 1 Introduction; 2 The Realm of Argumentation Studies; 3 A Model of a Critical Discussion; 4 Relevance; 5 Analysis as Reconstruction; 6 Rules for a Critical Discussion; 7 Fallacies; 8 A Code of Conduct for Reasonable Discussants; References; Index
330   $aIn this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.
606   $aPersuasion (Rhetoric)
606   $aPragmatics
606   $aDialectic
615  0$aPersuasion (Rhetoric)
615  0$aPragmatics.
615  0$aDialectic.
676   $a808
700   $aGrootendorst$b R$g(Robert),$f1944-2000.$0324960
701   $aEemeren$b F. H. van$g(Frans Hendrik),$f1946-$0850183
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910828058703321
996   $aA systematic theory of argumentation$94195270
997   $aUNINA