LEADER 04506nam 2200793Ia 450 001 9910828052003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-107-16103-7 010 $a1-280-54113-X 010 $a0-511-21541-X 010 $a0-511-21720-X 010 $a0-511-21183-X 010 $a0-511-31581-3 010 $a0-511-61710-0 010 $a0-511-21360-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000353101 035 $a(EBL)266609 035 $a(OCoLC)171139149 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000223438 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11187187 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000223438 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10177615 035 $a(PQKB)10088796 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511617102 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL266609 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10131651 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL54113 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC266609 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000353101 100 $a20031205d2004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPolitical disagreement $ethe survival of diverse opinions within communication networks /$fRobert Huckfeldt, Paul E. Johnson, John Sprague 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aCambridge, UK ;$aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d2004 215 $a1 online resource (xxi, 249 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-54223-5 311 $a0-521-83430-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 235-245) and index. 327 $aCover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Figures; Tables; Acknowledgments; 1 Communication, Influence, and the Capacity of Citizens to Disagree; 2 New Information, Old Information, and Persistent Disagreement; 3 Dyads, Networks, and Autoregressive Influence; 4 Disagreement, Heterogeneity, and the Effectiveness of Political Communication; 5 Disagreement, Heterogeneity, and Persuasion: How Does Disagreement Survive?; 6 Agent-Based Explanations, Patterns of Communication, and the Inevitability of Homogeneity 327 $a7 Agent-Based Explanations, Autoregressive Influence, and the Survival of Disagreement8 Heterogeneous Networks and Citizen Capacity: Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement; 9 Summary, Implications, and Conclusion; Appendix A The Indianapolis-St. Louis Study; Appendix B The Opinion Simulation Software; References; Index 330 $aPolitical disagreement is widespread within the communication network of ordinary citizens; furthermore, political diversity within these networks is entirely consistent with a theory of democratic politics built on the importance of individual interdependence. The persistence of political diversity and disagreement does not imply that political interdependence is absent among citizens or that political influence is lacking. The book's analysis makes a number of contributions. The authors demonstrate the ubiquitous nature of political disagreement. They show that communication and influence within dyads is autoregressive - that the consequences of dyadic interactions depend on the distribution of opinions within larger networks of communication. They argue that the autoregressive nature of political influence serves to sustain disagreement within patterns of social interaction, as it restores the broader political relevance of social communication and influence. They eliminate the deterministic implications that have typically been connected to theories of democratic politics based on interdependent citizens. 410 0$aCambridge studies in political psychology and public opinion. 606 $aCommunication in politics 606 $aPolitical participation 606 $aConsensus (Social sciences) 606 $aPublic opinion 606 $aDemocracy 615 0$aCommunication in politics. 615 0$aPolitical participation. 615 0$aConsensus (Social sciences) 615 0$aPublic opinion. 615 0$aDemocracy. 676 $a320/.01/4 700 $aHuckfeldt$b R. Robert$0121310 701 $aJohnson$b P. E$g(Paul E.)$01763425 701 $aSprague$b John D$01763426 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828052003321 996 $aPolitical disagreement$94203839 997 $aUNINA