LEADER 03932nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910828043103321 005 20210422024831.0 010 $a0-674-07493-9 010 $a0-674-07491-2 024 7 $a10.4159/harvard.9780674074910 035 $a(CKB)2550000001039378 035 $a(EBL)3301250 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000860439 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11503663 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000860439 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10897906 035 $a(PQKB)11075218 035 $a(DE-B1597)209806 035 $a(OCoLC)831664356 035 $a(OCoLC)979739986 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674074910 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3301250 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10678063 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3301250 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001039378 100 $a20120921d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aLegal integration of Islam$b[electronic resource] $ea transatlantic comparison /$fChristian Joppke, John Torpey 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cHarvard University Press$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (216 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-674-07284-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aNeutrality, liberalism, and islam integration in Europe and America -- Limits of excluding: the French burqa law of 2010 -- Limits of including: Germany's reticence to "cooperate" with organized Islam -- "Reasonable accommodation" and the limits of multiculturalism in Canada -- The dog that didn't bark: Islam and religious pluralism in the United States -- Islam and identity in the liberal state. 330 $aThe status of Islam in Western societies remains deeply contentious. Countering strident claims on both the right and left, Legal Integration of Islam offers an empirically informed analysis of how four liberal democracies-France, Germany, Canada, and the United States-have responded to the challenge of integrating Islam and Muslim populations. Demonstrating the centrality of the legal system to this process, Christian Joppke and John Torpey reject the widely held notion that Europe is incapable of accommodating Islam and argue that institutional barriers to Muslim integration are no greater on one side of the Atlantic than the other. While Muslims have achieved a substantial degree of equality working through the courts, political dynamics increasingly push back against these gains, particularly in Europe. From a classical liberal viewpoint, religion can either be driven out of public space, as in France, or included without sectarian preference, as in Germany. But both policies come at a price-religious liberty in France and full equality in Germany. Often seen as the flagship of multiculturalism, Canada has found itself responding to nativist and liberal pressures as Muslims become more assertive. And although there have been outbursts of anti-Islamic sentiment in the United States, the legal and political recognition of Islam is well established and largely uncontested. Legal Integration of Islam brings to light the successes and the shortcomings of integrating Islam through law without denying the challenges that this religion presents for liberal societies. 606 $aLegal polycentricity$zEurope 606 $aLegal polycentricity$zNorth America 606 $aIslamic law$zEurope 606 $aIslamic law$zNorth America 615 0$aLegal polycentricity 615 0$aLegal polycentricity 615 0$aIslamic law 615 0$aIslamic law 676 $a340.9094 700 $aJoppke$b Christian$0691976 701 $aTorpey$b John$f1959-$0291266 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910828043103321 996 $aLegal integration of Islam$94125242 997 $aUNINA