LEADER 04479nam 2200685 450 001 9910827960703321 005 20230421025506.0 010 $a3-11-093792-1 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110937923 035 $a(CKB)3710000000025175 035 $a(EBL)3043642 035 $a(OCoLC)922946882 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001045086 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11661774 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001045086 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11112216 035 $a(PQKB)11704011 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3043642 035 $a(DE-B1597)45755 035 $a(OCoLC)979590602 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110937923 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3043642 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10772726 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000025175 100 $a19970128d1996 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#---|u||u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPhraseology in English academic writing $esome implications for language learning and dictionary making /$fPeter Andrew Howarth 205 $aReprint 2013 210 1$aTu?bingen :$cM. Niemeyer,$d1996. 215 $a1 online resource (238 p.) 225 0 $aLexicographica. Series Maior ;$v75 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a3-484-30975-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [225]-230). 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAbstract --$tRésumé --$tZusammenfassung --$tIntroduction --$tChapter One. The Classification of Word Combinations --$tChapter Two. The Processing of Conventional Language --$tChapter Three. The Analysis of Native-speaker Academic Writing --$tChapter Four. The Phraseology of Non-native Academic Writing --$tChapter Five. Collocational Dictionaries for Learners of English --$tConclusion --$tAppendices --$tReferences 330 $aThis study examines the use of one category of prefabricated language (restricted lexical collocations) in native and non-native academic English in the social sciences, in an attempt to throw light on a neglected aspect of learner competence. It first surveys the existing theoretical viewpoints on word combinations and then reviews experimental research into the psycholinguistic processing of prefabricated language, which suggest that the role of conventional expressions is to facilitate fluent production and rapid comprehension. A computer-based corpus of native academic writing is analyzed to discover to what extent and how such collocations are used in formal written English. Conventionality of style, it is suggested, aids precision of expression, clearly a quality highly valued in academic argument. A corpus of non-native writing is then subjected to a similar analysis. While the collocational errors learners make do not on the whole seriously destroy intelligibility, they can lead to a lack of precision and obscure the clarity of expression required in academic communication. Pedagogical implications are then considered, and it is seen that for the most part published teaching materials have failed to recognize the nature of collocations in general and offer little help. The final part of the study examines the treatment of restricted collocations in both general and phraseological dictionaries for learners. These are evaluated on their selection and presentation of collocations shown by the preceding research to be problematic for advanced learners. The conclusion suggests that, for such learners, who are mostly studying the language independently, good reference works are needed in the form of specialist collocational dictionaries. The results of this research help to establish principles for the design of such dictionaries. 410 0$aLexicographica. Series Maior 606 $aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis 606 $aEnglish language$xStudy and teaching 606 $aEnglish language$vTerms and phrases 606 $aEnglish language$xLexicography 606 $aAcademic writing 615 0$aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aEnglish language$xStudy and teaching. 615 0$aEnglish language 615 0$aEnglish language$xLexicography. 615 0$aAcademic writing. 676 $a420/.1/41 700 $aHowarth$b Peter Andrew$01668011 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827960703321 996 $aPhraseology in English academic writing$94028287 997 $aUNINA