LEADER 05537nam 2200685 450 001 9910827886803321 005 20230803205628.0 010 $a90-272-6964-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000000262183 035 $a(EBL)1820691 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001349995 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12490367 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001349995 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11285950 035 $a(PQKB)11546481 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1820691 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1820691 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10956399 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL652832 035 $a(OCoLC)893740611 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000262183 100 $a20141031h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aFrames of understanding in text and discourse $etheoretical foundations and descriptive applications /$fAlexander Ziem 210 1$aAmsterdam, The Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins B.V.,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (440 p.) 225 1 $aHuman Cognitive Processing,$x1387-6724 ;$vVolume 48 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-21552-9 311 $a90-272-4664-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aFrames of Understanding in Text and Discourse; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; In memory of Chuck Fillmore; Table of contents; Preface; Introduction; 1. Semantic interest in frames; 1.1 Evidence for frames ; 1.2 Frames in research ; 1.2.1 The development of frame research ; 1.2.2 Frames and other representation formats ; 1.3 Frames in cognitive science ; 1.3.1 Cognition, representation, categorization ; 1.3.2 Positions in cognitive theory ; 1.3.3 Frames in modularist and holistic approaches ; 2. Cognitive theory and semantic issues ; 2.1 Holism vs. Modularism: an example 327 $a2.2 Modularism 2.2.1 Two-level semantics (M. Bierwisch) ; 2.2.2 Frame semantics vs. two-level semantics: some issues ; 2.2.3 Example analyses ; 2.2.4 Three-level semantics (M. Schwarz) ; 2.3 Holism ; 2.3.1 Meaning as conceptualization ; 2.3.2 Language as conceptualization (R. Langacker vs. R. Jackendoff) ; 3. The holistic paradigm ; 3.1 Are linguistic and conceptual knowledge distinct entities? ; 3.1.1 Essence vs. accidence? ; 3.1.2 Synthetic vs. analytic truths? ; 3.1.3 Culture vs. language? ; 3.1.4 Semantics vs. pragmatics? ; 3.2 The "space of understanding" (C. Demmerling) 327 $a3.3 The postulate of U-relevance 3.3.1 Busse's explicative semantics ; 3.3.2 Approaches in psycholinguistic research on language-processing ; 3.3.3 Comparison of knowledge types ; 4. Semiotic issues ; 4.1 Linguistic signs as constructions ; 4.1.1 The symbolic principle in construction grammar and Cognitive Grammar ; 4.1.2 What are constructions and symbolic units? ; 4.1.3 Constructions in the "space of understanding" ; 4.2 Frames and symbolic units ; 4.2.1 Conventional vs. contextual aspects of meaning (R. Langacker) 327 $a4.2.2 Are "situations" and "backgrounds" elements of semantic units? (J. Zlatev) 4.2.3 Are "scenes" elements of semantic units? (C. Fillmore) ; 4.3 Relations ; 4.3.1 Evoked and invoked frames (C. Fillmore) ; 4.3.2 Meaning potentials (J. Allwood) ; 5. Frames as schemata ; 5.1 Categorization ; 5.2 Schemata ; 5.2.1 Schemata as representational formats of non-specific modality ; 5.2.2 Shared features of frames and schemata ; 5.3 Frames as schemata: example analysis ; 6. The structural constituents of frames ; 6.1 Issues ; 6.2 Reference ; 6.2.1 Frames as a projection area of referentiality 327 $a6.2.2 Every word evokes a frame 6.3 Predication potential: slots ; 6.3.1 What are slots? ; 6.3.2 Hyperonym type reduction: determining slots ; 6.3.3 Example analysis ; 6.4 Explicit predications: fillers ; 6.4.1 When are predications explicit? ; 6.4.2 Linguistic manifestations ; 6.5 Implicit predications: default values ; 6.5.1 Recurrent schema instantiations: token and type frequency ; 6.5.2 "Cognitive trails" as phenomena of the third kind ; 6.5.3 Type frequency: an example ; 7. Frames in discourse: the financial investors as Locusts metaphor ; 7.1 Preliminaries 327 $a7.1.1 Frames as an instrument of corpus-based analysis 330 $aHow do words mean? What is the nature of meaning? How can we grasp a word's meaning? The frame-semantic approach developed in this book offers some well-founded answers to such long-standing, but still controversial issues. Following Charles Fillmore's definition of frames as both organizers of experience and tools for understanding, the monograph attempts to examine one of the most important concepts of Cognitive Linguistics in more detail. The point of departure is Fillmore's conception of "frames of understanding" - an approach to (cognitive) semantics that Fillmore developed from 1975 to 1 410 0$aHuman cognitive processing ;$vVolume 48. 606 $aFrames (Linguistics) 606 $aSemantics$xPsychological aspects 606 $aCognition 615 0$aFrames (Linguistics) 615 0$aSemantics$xPsychological aspects. 615 0$aCognition. 676 $a401/.43 700 $aZiem$b Alexander$0764013 702 $aSchwerin$b Catherine 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827886803321 996 $aFrames of understanding in text and discourse$93937647 997 $aUNINA