LEADER 02889nam  2200553 a 450 
001 9910827777103321
005 20230213212241.0
010   $a1-283-35920-0
010   $a9786613359209
010   $a90-272-7964-0
035   $a(CKB)2550000000073051
035   $a(EBL)805803
035   $a(OCoLC)769342208
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001004620
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11601354
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001004620
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11047012
035   $a(PQKB)10985768
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805803
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805803
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517189
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000073051
100   $a19850221d1984      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aLanguage and action$b[electronic resource] $ea reassessment of speech act theory /$fDanilo Marcondes de Souza Filho
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cBenjamins$d1984
215   $a1 online resource (175 p.)
225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond,$x0166-6258 ;$v5:6
300   $aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (Ph. D.--University of St. Andrews, Great Britain).
311   $a90-272-2538-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aLANGUAGE AND ACTION A Reassessment of Speech Act Theory; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Dedication; FOREWORD; Table of contents; 1. INTRODUCTION; 2. THE THEORY OF SPEECH ACTS; 2.1. Performatives; 2.2. Meaning and force; 2.3. Intentions and conventions; 3. THE SOCIAL ASPECTS OF LANGUAGE-USE; 3.1. Language as action in a social context; 3.2. Conventions; 3.2.1. Lewis on conventions; 3.2.2. Conventions and speech acts; 3.3. Action guiding speech acts; 3.3.1. General characterization; 3.3.2. The method of analysis; 3.3.3. Further distinctions; 4. CONCLUSION; FOOTNOTES; REFERENCES
330   $aThis work consists of an examination and revision of some of the main theses of Speech Act Theory in relation to the problem of ideology and action-guiding language. Starting from the idea that linguistic philosophy must take into account how the social structure of the linguistic community may influence and direct the way its language is used, a critical method of analysis is proposed, developing Speech Act Theory in a way suitable for this purpose. The main guideline of this proposal is the consideration that a theory of action rather than a theory of meaning should be taken as central in th
410  0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v5:6.
606   $aSpeech acts (Linguistics)
615  0$aSpeech acts (Linguistics)
676   $a401/.9
700   $aSouza Filho$b Danilo Marcondes de$01680499
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910827777103321
996   $aLanguage and action$94049246
997   $aUNINA